FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 2)
Bridges & Wyatt [2022] FedCFamC2F 805
File number(s): ROC 488 of 2022 Judgment of: JUDGE DEMACK Date of judgment: 6 June 2022 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Parenting – Interim – where child has been living with a non-parent pursuant to a final consent order – where the mother has withheld the child following alleged disclosures of sexual abuse by the father – where the child has expressed a view to live with the mother – where the child has expressed suicidal ideation – where the statutory child protection authority is involved Legislation: Family Law Act1975 (Cth) pt VII Cases Cited: C & S [1998] FamCA 66
Morgan & Miles [2007] FamCA 1230
Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 41 Date of last submission/s: 2 June 2022 Date of hearing: 2 June 2022 Place: Mackay Solicitor for the Applicant: Ms Goodwin First Respondent: Self-Represented Litigant Second Respondent: Self-Represented Litigant Independent Children’s Lawyer: Lyrene Wiid Lawyer & Migration Agent Interested Party: Department Of Children, Youth Justice And Multicultural Affairs ORDERS
ROC 488 of 2022 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN: MR BRIDGES
Applicant
AND: MS WYATT
First Respondent
MR C BRIDGES
Second Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE DEMACK
DATE OF ORDER:
6 JUNE 2022
THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:
1.That the mother is to provide the child X born in 2022 (“the child”) to the paternal grandfather, Mr BRIDGES at 3:00pm on 7 June 2022 at the Suburb D Police Station, E Street, Suburb D.
2.That if the child is not made available to the paternal grandfather, a recovery order will issue upon receipt of an affidavit from the solicitor for the paternal grandfather outlining the failure of the mother to comply with Order one (1) herein.
3.That the child X born in 2010 live with the paternal grandfather, Mr BRIDGES on an interim basis until further order of the Court.
4.That the mother is prohibited from and an injunction issue prohibiting her from advising the child of the handover at any point in time, prior to 9:00am on 7 June 2022.
5.That a copy of today’s order be provided to the Department Of Children, Youth Justice and Multicultural Affairs.
6.That the parties’ personal appearance is required on 13 June 2022.
7.That all parties have leave to appear by telephone link on 13 June 2022 and are required to dial into the Court on 02 9338 2221, you will then be asked to enter a participant code, please use ….
8.That the matter be adjourned to 11.30am on 13 June 2022 in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia in Rockhampton.
IT IS NOTED:
A.That pursuant to section 65DA(2) of the Family Law Act 1975, the particulars of the obligations these orders create and the particulars of the consequences that may follow if a person contravenes these orders are set out in Attachment A and these particulars are included in these orders.
Continue reading Bridges & Wyatt
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Bridges & Wyatt [2022] FedCFamC2F 805
- Case
- [2022] FedCFamC2F 805
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the appropriate interim parenting arrangements for the child, considering the allegations of sexual abuse, the child's expressed wishes, and the involvement of the statutory child protection authority. The court had to weigh the urgency of the situation against the need to protect the child from potential harm.
The court found that the child should be returned to the paternal grandfather, Mr Bridges, and live with him on an interim basis. The court issued an order for the child to be handed over to the paternal grandfather at a specified time and place, with a recovery order to follow if the mother failed to comply. The court also prohibited the mother from advising the child of the handover prior to a specified time. The court ordered that the matter be adjourned to allow for further consideration of the child's best interests.
The court made an order for the child to be handed over to the paternal grandfather, for the child to live with the paternal grandfather on an interim basis, and for the mother to be prohibited from advising the child of the handover prior to a specified time. The court also ordered that the matter be adjourned to allow for further consideration of the child's best interests.
Orders
Orders of the court
ROC 488 of 2022
FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN:
MR BRIDGES
Applicant
AND:
MS WYATT
First Respondent
MR C BRIDGES
Second Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE DEMACK
DATE OF ORDER:
6 JUNE 2022
THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:
1. That the mother is to provide the child X born in 2022 (“the child”) to the paternal grandfather, Mr BRIDGES at 3:00pm on 7 June 2022 at the Suburb D Police Station, E Street, Suburb D.
2. That if the child is not made available to the paternal grandfather, a recovery order will issue upon receipt of an affidavit from the solicitor for the paternal grandfather outlining the failure of the mother to comply with Order one (1) herein.
3. That the child X born in 2010 live with the paternal grandfather, Mr BRIDGES on an interim basis until further order of the Court.
4. That the mother is prohibited from and an injunction issue prohibiting her from advising the child of the handover at any point in time, prior to 9:00am on 7 June 2022.
5. That a copy of today’s order be provided to the Department Of Children, Youth Justice and Multicultural Affairs.
6. That the parties’ personal appearance is required on 13 June 2022.
7. That all parties have leave to appear by telephone link on 13 June 2022 and are required to dial into the Court on 02 9338 2221, you will then be asked to enter a participant code, please use ….
8. That the matter be adjourned to 11.30am on 13 June 2022 in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia in Rockhampton.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.