Bride & Anor v Fitzgerald

[1996] HCATrans 376

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Perth  No P19 of 1996

B e t w e e n -

EDWARD JAMES BRIDE and WENDY MARGARET BRIDE as Trustees of THE PINWERNYING FAMILY TRUST

Applicant

and

HAMMOND FITZGERALD and KING

Respondent

Grounds for Decision

DAWSON J

McHUGH J
GUMMOW J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON TUESDAY, 3 DECEMBER 1996, AT 10.19 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

DAWSON J:   This application for special leave to appeal was considered by Justices McHugh, Gummow and myself.  The questions which the applicants seek to raise are largely questions of fact and would not attract special leave to appeal.  Nor does the application raise any point of principle.  There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the conclusion reached by the Full Court and an appeal would not enjoy any reasonable prospect of success.  For these reasons, special leave to appeal is refused with costs.

AT 10.20 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED