BRETT REAPER & ANOR
v.
PETR VRSECKY AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF BRETT VINCENT REAPER
[2017] HCASL 168
M46/2017
An extension of time is necessary to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The application does not raise any question of law that would enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The application should be dismissed. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
P.A. Keane
15 August 2017J.J. Edelman
- AGLC
- Brett Reaper & Anor v Petr Vrsecky as trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Brett Vincent Reaper [2017] HCASL 168
- Case
- [2017] HCASL 168
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining whether an extension of time should be granted to the applicants to allow their appeal to proceed, and whether the application raised any questions of law that had sufficient prospects of success. The court was also required to consider whether it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicants. The High Court needed to balance the need for finality in legal proceedings with the interests of justice in allowing an appeal to proceed.
The court held that an extension of time was not necessary as the application did not raise any questions of law that would enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The court found that the application should be dismissed, and as such, it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicants. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for an extension of time and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order to that effect.
No further orders were made by the court, as the primary focus was on dismissing the application for an extension of time. The High Court concluded that the application did not meet the necessary threshold for an appeal to proceed, and thus, no further action was required in relation to the matter.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.