Brenna & Kolby

Case [2023] FedCFamC2F 1523


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 2)

Brenna & Kolby [2023] FedCFamC2F 1523

File number(s): BRC 12538 of 2021
Judgment of: JUDGE COPE
Date of judgment: 29 November 2023 
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – de facto relationship – discrete issue – dispute as to duration of the de facto relationship – whether applicant is out of time to bring property settlement proceedings – declaration as to date and duration of de facto relationship – where the applicant is out of time to bring property proceedings – where the applicant has not demonstrated hardship – declaration made – leave refused – application dismissed.  
Legislation:

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 44, 90RD, 90SM

Cases cited:

Althaus and Althaus (1982) FLC 91-233

Edmunds & Edmunds (2018) FLC 93-847

Fairbairn v Radecki (2022) 400 ALR 613

Gadzen & Simkin (2018) FLC 93-871

Hall and Hall (1979) FLC 90-679

Radecki & Fairbairn (2020) FLC 94-001

Sharp v Sharp (2011) 50 Fam LR 567

Whitford and Whitford (1979) FLC 90-612

Division: Division 2 Family Law
Number of paragraphs: 131
Date of hearing: 6 April & 16 May 2023
Place: Brisbane
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Moutasallem
Solicitor for the Applicant: Millennium Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondent: Not to be disclosed

ORDERS

BRC 12538 of 2021

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MR BRENNA

Applicant

AND:

MS KOLBY

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE COPE

DATE OF ORDER:

29 NOVEMBER 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.It is declared pursuant to s 90RD(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Act”) that for the purposes of any order pursuant to s 90SM of the Act, Mr Brenna and Ms Kolby were in a de facto relationship between the following dates:

(a)2008; and

(b)May 2016.

2.The application by the applicant for an order granting leave pursuant to s 44(6) of the Act to commence proceedings under Part VIIIAB of the Act and in particular s 90SM of the Act is refused.

Note:   The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under a pseudonym has been approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

JUDGE COPE

PART 1: INTRODUCTION

  1. The proceedings were commenced on 20 September 2021 by the applicant de facto husband, Mr Brenna (“the applicant”). The de facto wife,…

Continue reading Brenna & Kolby

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Brenna & Kolby [2023] FedCFamC2F 1523
Case
[2023] FedCFamC2F 1523
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mr. Brenna has applied to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for a declaration as to the date and duration of his de facto relationship with Ms. Kolby. The dispute arises due to the timing of Mr. Brenna's application for property settlement proceedings. Mr. Brenna seeks to bring his application outside the statutory time limits, arguing that the Court should exercise its discretion to allow the proceedings under section 44(6) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). Mr. Brenna also requests a declaration under section 90RD(2) of the Act that he and Ms. Kolby were in a de facto relationship between 2008 and May 2016. The Court considered whether the application was brought out of time and whether Mr. Brenna had demonstrated sufficient hardship to warrant the Court exercising its discretion under section 44(6) of the Act. The Court found that Mr. Brenna's application was brought outside the statutory time limits, and he had not demonstrated sufficient hardship to warrant the Court exercising its discretion. The Court dismissed Mr. Brenna's application for leave to commence property settlement proceedings. The Court did, however, make a declaration as to the date and duration of the de facto relationship between the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

BRC 12538 of 2021

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MR BRENNA

Applicant

AND:

MS KOLBY

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE COPE

DATE OF ORDER:

29 NOVEMBER 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. It is declared pursuant to s 90RD(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Act”) that for the purposes of any order pursuant to s 90SM of the Act, Mr Brenna and Ms Kolby were in a de facto relationship between the following dates:

(a) 2008; and

(b) May 2016.

2. The application by the applicant for an order granting leave pursuant to s 44(6) of the Act to commence proceedings under Part VIIIAB of the Act and in particular s 90SM of the Act is refused.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.