Brendan Eather v Artform Kitchens (Intl) Pty Ltd

[2014] FWC 2933

[2014] FWC 2933

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal

Brendan Eather
v
Artform Kitchens (Intl) Pty Ltd
(U2012/17455)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY MELBOURNE, 5 MAY 2014

Application for relief from unfair dismissal - Respondent deregistered - no reasonable prospects of success - application dismissed.

[1] On 24 December 2012, Mr Brendan Eather made an application for remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Mr Eather’s employment was terminated by Artform Kitchens (Intl) Pty Ltd (Artform) on 5 December 2012.

[2] Conciliation was listed however, it could not take place. Directions were issued and the matter was listed for hearing.

[3] On 6 March 2013, the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) was advised that Artform was in voluntary liquidation.

[4] On 8 April 2013, the Commission wrote to Mr Eather and advised him that creditors had passed a resolution to voluntarily wind up the company and had appointed a liquidator. The letter referred Mr Eather to s.500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Corporations Act).

[5] Section 500(2) of the Corporations Act provides as follows:

(2) After the passing of the resolution for voluntary winding up, no action or other civil proceeding is to be proceeded with or commenced against the company except by leave of the Court and subject to such terms as the Court imposes.

[6] Mr Eather was provided with an opportunity to make submission in respect of the Commission’s position as noted in [4]. He did not make any submissions and did not file any further material. Consequently Mr Eather’s application was stayed until the Commission had further information.

[7] An ASIC search disclosed that Artform was deregistered on 6 February 2014.

[8] On 3 April 2014, the Commission wrote to Mr Eather and advised him of deregistration of Artform. The Commission further advised that no proceeding could continue against a company which is deregistered. Mr Eather was given an opportunity to file a notice of discontinuance. He did not respond to the correspondence or file a notice of discontinuance.

[9] Taking into account the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that Mr Eather’s application has no reasonable prospects of success as Arform no longer exists. Therefore, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(c) of the Act.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR550254>