Brand2Content t/as Franchise Works v Dalby
Case
•
[2019] NSWCA 16
•18 February 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Brand2Content t/as Franchise Works v Dalby [2019] NSWCA 16
[2019] NSWCA 16
18 February 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal concerned an application for costs orders against a non-party, Adam Dalby, who was the common director of the defendant/appellant companies, Brand2Content Pty Ltd (trading as Franchise Works) and Franchise Works Pty Ltd. The dispute arose from an appeal concerning the exercise of the court's discretion to award costs against a non-party, and the application of an offer of compromise under UCPR 41.14.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether it was in the interests of justice to order Adam Dalby, as a non-party and common director, to pay the costs of the appeal, and whether the costs should be assessed on an ordinary or indemnity basis. This involved considering the factors relevant to the court's discretion in awarding costs against individuals who are not parties to the litigation but have a significant role in the proceedings.
The court determined that Adam Dalby was to pay the costs of the appeal. The costs were ordered to be assessed on the ordinary basis up to 16 March 2018, and on an indemnity basis thereafter, reflecting the application of the offer of compromise provisions. This outcome indicates the court found sufficient grounds to exercise its discretion to order the non-party director to bear the costs of the appeal.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether it was in the interests of justice to order Adam Dalby, as a non-party and common director, to pay the costs of the appeal, and whether the costs should be assessed on an ordinary or indemnity basis. This involved considering the factors relevant to the court's discretion in awarding costs against individuals who are not parties to the litigation but have a significant role in the proceedings.
The court determined that Adam Dalby was to pay the costs of the appeal. The costs were ordered to be assessed on the ordinary basis up to 16 March 2018, and on an indemnity basis thereafter, reflecting the application of the offer of compromise provisions. This outcome indicates the court found sufficient grounds to exercise its discretion to order the non-party director to bear the costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Contract Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Offer and Acceptance
-
Remedies
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
UTSG Pty Ltd v Sydney Metro (No 6) [2020] NSWLEC 63
Cases Citing This Decision
9
PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird
[2022] NSWSC 1656
EMG Stone Pty Ltd v Gonda
[2022] NSWSC 1674
Anderson v Canaccord Genuity Financial Ltd (No 2)
[2022] NSWSC 649
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
4
Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd
[1992] HCA 28
Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd
[1992] HCA 28
FPM Constructions Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Blue Mountains
[2005] NSWCA 340