Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services Australia Pty Ltd T/A Brand Industrial Services

Case [2023] FWCA 2739


[2023] FWCA 2739

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services Australia Pty Ltd T/A Brand Industrial Services

(AG2023/2591)

BRAND ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. HUNTER VALLEY BRANCH ALL SITES AGREEMENT 2023

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON

SYDNEY, 28 AUGUST 2023

Application for approval of the Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services Australia Pty. Ltd. Hunter Valley Branch All Sites Agreement 2023.

  1. Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services Australia Pty Ltd T/A Brand Industrial Services (the Employer) has made an application for the approval of the Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services Australia Pty. Ltd. Hunter Valley Branch All Sites Agreement 2023 (the Agreement). The application was made under s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) and “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) were bargaining representatives for the Agreement and have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the AMWU and CFMMEU.

  1. The AMWU notes that Clause 13.1 – Ordinary Hours of Work – Day Work and Clause 13.3.5 – Public Holidays are potentially inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). Noting the NES Precedence clause at 4(c) of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 4 September 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 September 2026.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE521283 PR765591>

Details
AGLC
Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services Australia Pty Ltd T/A Brand Industrial Services [2023] FWCA 2739
Case
[2023] FWCA 2739
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services Australia Pty Ltd trading as Brand Industrial Services, sought approval from the Fair Work Commission for the Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services Australia Pty. Ltd. Hunter Valley Branch All Sites Agreement 2023. The application was contested by the United Voice NSW Hunter Local Union and two employees of the company. The dispute centred on the terms and conditions of employment outlined in the proposed agreement, including matters such as wages, working hours, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions for the workforce at the Hunter Valley branch of the company.

The central legal issues before the Commission involved whether the proposed agreement was made in the exercise of the company's genuine and unfettered choice, whether it complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether it provided for terms and conditions of employment that were no worse off overall (NWO) than the relevant award or safety net. The Commission had to assess if the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval and if it fairly represented the interests of the employees.

After considering the submissions from both parties and the evidence presented, the Commission found that the proposed agreement did not meet the NWO test as it contained provisions that would result in some employees being worse off in terms of their entitlements and conditions. The Commission also noted that the process by which the agreement was made did not fully comply with the statutory requirements. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed. The Commission's decision was based on the need to protect the safety net of minimum employment standards and ensure that employees were not disadvantaged by the terms of the proposed agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.