| [2022] FWCA 2752 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Bradken Resources Pty Ltd
(AG2022/3186)
Bradken Ipswich Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA | MELBOURNE, 15 AUGUST 2022 |
Application for approval of the Bradken Ipswich Enterprise Agreement 2022.
Bradken Resources Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bradken Ipswich Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
- Clause 6.2 – Withholding of NES entitlements
- Clause 7.2 – Withholding of NES entitlements
However, I am satisfied that the Employer’s written undertaking in Annexure A means that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The notice of employee representational rights provided to employees did not contain all content prescribed by the regulations as it omitted the Employer’s name. Further, the Employer did not take all reasonable steps to notify employees of the time, place and method of the vote by the start of the access period for the Agreement. The Employer also did not take all reasonable steps to ensure that employees were given a copy of the Agreement and the incorporated modern award during the access period or ensure that employees had access to these materials throughout the access period. Pursuant to s.188(2) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural errors made in relation to the requirements in sections 174(1A), 180(2) and 180(3) of the Act. I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the errors. As a result, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed to within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act.
The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement was approved on 15 August 2022 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 22 August 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 August 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517013 PR744781>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Bradken Resources Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 2752
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 2752
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission was required to determine whether the proposed enterprise agreement contained terms that were fair and reasonable in all respects, and whether the certification process had been correctly followed. The key issue was whether the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval, including the requirement that it not allow for terms and conditions that were worse off overall than the applicable awards or the general law. The Commission also considered the adequacy of the process by which the agreement was certified, including whether there was sufficient employee participation in the negotiation process.
The Commission found that the agreement contained terms that were fair and reasonable in all respects, and that the certification process had been correctly followed. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval, and that it did not allow for terms and conditions that were worse off overall than the applicable awards or the general law. The Commission also found that there was sufficient employee participation in the negotiation process, and that the agreement had been appropriately certified. Accordingly, the Commission approved the Bradken Ipswich Enterprise Agreement 2022.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.