Brabazon, G. v Western Mail Ltd

Case

[1985] FCA 481

17 Sep 1985

No judgment structure available for this case.

GviSTEkN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRJ

No. WAG 32 of 1965

GENERAL

G I V I S I O N

l

ON APPFAL PROM A SINGLE JTJOGE OF THE FEDERAL

COURT

OF A[JSTRALIA

IN THE MAT

'

of an application for

damacres pursuant to the Trade

Practices

Act

1 9 7 4 .

BETWEEN :

2

N

A

:

Respondent

-_

1. The appeal be dlsmissed.

2 .

The appellant pay the respondent's costs

of the

appeal.

3 .

Reserve

llberty to the respondent to

apply with

respect to outstanding reserved costs.

if any.

Note: Settlement and entry

of orders IS dealt with in Order

36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE MA=

or' an application f o r

damaqes pursuant to the Trade

Practlces Act 1974.

/-

-.

1 .

*\

A<$ ;__--.

,

,,

BETWEEN:

A

N

D

:

Respondent

c

COKAM:

Sweenev. Sheppard and Beaumont.

JJ.

DATED: 17 September 1985

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

THE COrJkT:

In our oplnlon.

%he

appeal

should

be

dlsmlssed. We auree wlth the declslon of the learned Judge

and with

h l s reasons that no contraventlon of

s . 5 2 of the

Trade Practices Act, 1974 has been established. There is nothlna that we can usefully add in thls connection.

Since the question of damacres was not tully argued

I

betorc us. It is Inapproprlate that we make any observatlons

on that, questlon.

The orders 01 the Court are

-

1. That %he appeal be dlsmlssed.

1. That the appellant, pav

%he respondent's

c o s t s of

the apaeal.

3 . Reserve Liberty to

the

respondent o

apply

wlth

respect

outstandlng

to

reserved costs. ~f anv.

I certlfy that thls and the l precedina

paue 1s a true copv of the reasons for

i '

I

!udgnent hereln of the Court.

Assoclate I

Dated 17 September 1985.

Counsel and Solicitors

Mr. A. Camp was Instructed

bp

for Appellant:

R.J. Butcher & Co.

Counsel and Solicltors

Mr. M. Bennett was mstructed

for Respondent:

by Keall Brlnsden

Date of hearlnu:

17 September 1985

Date Judqment Dellvered:

17 Septenber 1985

!

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0