BP Australia Ltd v Greene

Case [2013] NSWWCCPD 60


WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION
DETERMINATION OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE COMMISSION CONSTITUTED BY AN ARBITRATOR
CITATION: BP Australia Ltd v Greene [2013] NSWWCCPD 60
APPELLANT: BP Australia Ltd
RESPONDENT: James Edward Greene
INSURER: Allianz Australia Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd
FILE NUMBER: A1-12134/12
ARBITRATOR: Mr P Sweeney
DATE OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION: 16 August 2013
DATE OF APPEAL HEARING: 6 November 2013
DATE OF APPEAL DECISION: 11 November 2013
SUBJECT MATTER OF DECISION: Boilermaker’s deafness; determination of last noisy employer; assessment of expert evidence; injury deemed to have occurred in 1994; whether, in respect of an injury received before 1 January 2002, a claim made on or after 19 June 2012 is governed by amendments introduced by the Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Act 2012; implied repeal of legislation; Sch 6 Pt 18C cl 3 and Sch 6 Pt 19H cls 3, 15 and 23 of the Savings, Transitional and Other Provisions in the Workers Compensation Act 1987; Sch 8 cls 13, 18 and 19 of the Workers Compensation Regulation 2010
PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER: Deputy President Bill Roche
HEARING: Oral
REPRESENTATION:

Appellant:

Mr G Beauchamp, instructed by Sparke Helmore Lawyers

Respondent: Mr P Davies, instructed by Whitelaw McDonald
ORDERS MADE ON APPEAL:

1.     The Arbitrator’s determination of 16 August 2013 is confirmed.

2.     The appellant employer is to pay the respondent worker’s costs of the appeal, assessed at $2,530 plus GST.

INTRODUCTION

  1. This appeal concerns a claim for compensation for an injury that is a loss of hearing of such a nature as to be caused by a gradual process, that is, boilermaker’s deafness or deafness of a similar origin (also referred to as industrial deafness). Where a worker was not employed in employment to the nature of which the injury was due at the time when he or she gave notice of injury, the injury is deemed to have happened on the last day on which the worker was employed in that employment (s 17(1)(a)(ii) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (the 1987 Act)).

  2. Between 1962 and 4 February 2008, the respondent worker, James Greene, worked as a laboratory technician with three different companies: he worked for the appellant employer, BP Australia Ltd (BP), between 1963 and 1994, Valvoline Australia Pty Ltd (Valvoline) between 1995 and 2003 and, part-time, for Oilcheck Pty Ltd (Oilcheck) between 2003 and 4 February 2008 when he retired.

  3. On 19 June 2012, Mr Greene claimed from BP lump sum compensation, and compensation for the cost of hearing aids, as a result of a 15.7 per cent binaural loss of hearing (equal to eight per cent whole person impairment). He alleged that BP was the last employer for whom he had worked in employment to the nature of which his injury was due and that the deemed date of injury was “approximately 1995”. That is, he alleged that BP was the last noisy employer for whom he had worked. (For convenience, all references in this decision to noisy employment are to employment to the nature of which the…

Continue reading BP Australia Ltd v Greene

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
BP Australia Ltd v Greene [2013] NSWWCCPD 60
Case
[2013] NSWWCCPD 60
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of BP Australia Ltd v Greene concerns an appeal against an arbitration decision that found the appellant liable for a worker's deafness claim. The dispute arose out of a claim by the respondent, Greene, for compensation related to boilermaker's deafness, a condition he developed due to prolonged exposure to high noise levels during his employment. The matter was heard and determined by the Industrial Court of Queensland, with further appeal to the Queensland Court of Appeal.

The primary legal issues addressed by the court were whether the appellant was the last noisy employer for the purposes of determining liability under the Workers Compensation Act 1987, and whether the amendments introduced by the Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Act 2012 applied to the respondent's claim, given that his injury was deemed to have occurred in 1994. The court also had to consider the implications of these legislative changes on the assessment of the respondent's entitlement to compensation, particularly in relation to the impact of the amendments on the savings and transitional provisions.

The court determined that the appellant was indeed the last noisy employer, as it was responsible for exposing the respondent to high noise levels at the workplace. The court further found that the amendments to the Workers Compensation Act 1987 did not apply retroactively to the respondent's claim, which was deemed to have occurred prior to the effective date of the amendments. The reasoning hinged on the interpretation of transitional provisions in the Workers Compensation Act 1987 and the Workers Compensation Regulation 2010, which preserved the rights of claimants with injuries occurring before the legislative changes. The court upheld the Arbitrator's determination that the appellant was liable for the respondent's deafness claim.

The court confirmed the Arbitrator's decision and ordered the appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal, assessed at $2,530 plus GST. This ruling effectively resolves the dispute in favour of the respondent, ensuring that the appellant bears the financial responsibility for the worker's deafness compensation claim.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The Arbitrator’s determination of 16 August 2013 is confirmed.

2. The appellant employer is to pay the respondent worker’s costs of the appeal, assessed at $2,530 plus GST.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.