Boyce & Boyce

In *Boyce & Boyce*, heard before Young J, the parties sought to have consent orders regarding property and financial matters pronounced by the Court.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether to pronounce the consent orders as presented by the parties.

Young J adjourned the application for further hearing. The reasons for this adjournment were not detailed in the provided text, but the Court directed that the extempore reasons for judgment be transcribed and made available to the parties.