Bowers v Judicial Commission of NSW (No 2)

Case [2021] NSWCA 324


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Bowers v Judicial Commission of NSW (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 324
Hearing dates: 10 December 2021
Date of orders: 16 December 2021
Decision date: 16 December 2021
Before: Macfarlan JA;
McCallum JA
Decision:

(1)   Dismiss Mr Bowers’ notice of appeal filed 16 August 2021.

(2)   No order as to costs of the purported appeal or the Judicial Commission’s motion for its dismissal.

(3)   Dismiss Mr Bowers’ application for leave to appeal with costs.

Catchwords:

APPEALS – leave to appeal – challenge to dismissal of summons seeking relief against the Judicial Commission – no arguable reason advanced for concluding that primary judgment erroneous – no prospects of success on an appeal – leave to appeal refused

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Mr James Richard Bowers (Applicant)
Judicial Commission of NSW (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Self-represented (Applicant)
Mr D Farinha (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Crown Solicitor’s Office (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2021/233727; 2021/264783
Publication restriction: Nil
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Common Law
Citation:

[2021] NSWSC 917

Date of Decision:
30 July 2021
Before:
N Adams J
File Number(s):
2021/88757

Judgment

  1. THE COURT: By a notice of appeal filed on 16 August 2021 Mr Bowers sought to challenge a decision of N Adams J of 30 July 2021 in James Bowers v Judicial Commission of NSW (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 917. By that judgment her Honour dismissed Mr Bowers’ summons seeking relief against the Judicial Commission.

  2. When the competence of his appeal was challenged, Mr Bowers filed a summons seeking leave to appeal. That summons came on for hearing on 10 December 2021 together with the Judicial Commission’s motion for dismissal of the purported appeal as incompetent.

  3. At the hearing (and in fact at an earlier date as well) Mr Bowers accepted that the purported appeal was incompetent and that it should be dismissed. The Judicial Commission does not seek costs.

  4. Mr Bowers’ application for leave to appeal should also be dismissed for the reasons given by N Adams J in her thorough judgment of 30 July 2021 for dismissing the summons Mr Bowers filed at first instance. Mr Bowers did not advance in this Court any arguable reason for concluding that that judgment was erroneous in any respect. It follows that any appeal by Mr Bowers would not have any prospects of success.

  5. The Court makes the following orders:

  1. Dismiss Mr Bowers’ notice of appeal filed 16 August 2021.

  2. No order as to costs of the purported appeal or the Judicial Commission’s motion for its dismissal.

  3. Dismiss Mr Bowers’ application for leave to appeal with costs.

**********

Details
AGLC
Bowers v Judicial Commission of NSW (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 324
Case
[2021] NSWCA 324
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of *Bowers v Judicial Commission of NSW (No 2)* concerned an application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales. Mr Bowers sought to challenge the dismissal of his summons, which had sought relief against the Judicial Commission of New South Wales. The primary judgment under challenge had dismissed Mr Bowers' summons.

The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether there was an arguable reason to conclude that the primary judgment was erroneous, and consequently, whether Mr Bowers had any prospects of success on an appeal.

Macfarlan and McCallum JJA found that no arguable reason had been advanced to suggest the primary judgment was erroneous. Their Honours concluded that there were no prospects of success on an appeal, and therefore, leave to appeal was refused.

The Court of Appeal ordered the dismissal of Mr Bowers’ notice of appeal filed on 16 August 2021, with no order as to the costs of that purported appeal or the Judicial Commission’s motion for its dismissal. However, Mr Bowers’ application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Dismiss Mr Bowers’ notice of appeal filed 16 August 2021.

(2) No order as to costs of the purported appeal or the Judicial Commission’s motion for its dismissal.

(3) Dismiss Mr Bowers’ application for leave to appeal with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.