Boutros v Nationwide Capital Pty Ltd

In *Boutros v Nationwide Capital Pty Ltd*, the applicant sought a stay of orders made by the primary judge, which included ancillary orders for possession following a judicial sale. The respondents were Nationwide Capital Pty Ltd and another party.

The central legal issue before Gleeson JA was whether the applicant had an arguable case for appeal, which is a prerequisite for granting a stay of a judgment or order under rule 51.44 of the *Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005* (NSW).

Gleeson JA dismissed the applicant's notice of motion, finding that no arguable case for appeal had been demonstrated. Consequently, the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the first and second respondents in relation to the motion.