Boulos v Martin

Case

[2012] HCATrans 227

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2012] HCATrans 227

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S170 of 2012

No S171 of 2012

B e t w e e n -

BARRY BOULOS

Applicant

and

DR PETER MARTIN

Respondent

Application for reinstatement

GUMMOW J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT SYDNEY ON TUESDAY, 18 SEPTEMBER 2012, AT 9.33 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

HIS HONOUR:   By summons filed on 30 July 2012, in each of the applications‑ namely, Nos S170 and S171 of 2012 – the applicant seeks an order that his applications for special leave be not taken to be abandoned with reference to rule 41.10.4.1 of the High Court Rules.  The applications have been considered by me on the papers.

The order sought on each summons will be made but on terms that on or before 17 October the applicant file a written case and draft notices of appeal which comply with order 41, rule 10.1 through to order 41, rule 10.3.

In default of compliance, the applications for special leave will be taken finally to be abandoned.  The costs of the summons will be the costs, if any, of the special leave applications.

AT 9.35 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Negligence & Tort

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Causation

  • Damages

  • Duty of Care

  • Negligence

  • Reliance

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0