Boudet (Migration)

Case

[2024] AATA 2842

2 August 2024


Boudet (Migration) [2024] AATA 2842 (2 August 2024)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Gabriel Boudet

REPRESENTATIVE:  Mr Richard Timpson

CASE NUMBER:  2410946

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2023/7400578

MEMBER:Paul Windsor

DATE:2 August 2024

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Temporary Activity (Class GG) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 408 visa:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2)

Statement made on 02 August 2024 at 3:24 pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Temporary Activity (Class GG) visa – Subclass 408 (Temporary Activity) –criminal history statements – certificates from Australia, home country and another country provided to tribunal – decision made without hearing necessary – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 65, 360(2)(a)
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 2.03AA(1), (2)(a), Schedule 2, cl 408.216(1), Schedule 4, criteria 4001, 4002

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Temporary Activity (Class GG) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 19 December 2023. The criteria for a Temporary Activity (Class GG) visa are set out in Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). Additional criteria are prescribed in Division 2.1 of Part 2 of the Regulations. This includes reg 2.03AA which applies where a person is required to satisfy Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4001 or 4002: reg 2.03AA(1). In this case, cl 408.216(1) of Schedule 2 of the Regulations requires the applicant to meet PIC 4001 and 4002. The applicant is therefore required to satisfy the criterion in reg 2.03AA(2).

  3. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a statement from a relevant authority in a country where the person resides or has resided that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(b) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a completed approved Form 80. The Tribunal may waive the requirement in reg 2.03AA(2)(a) if it is not reasonable for the applicant to provide the statement: reg 2.03AA(3). The Tribunal cannot waive the requirement for the applicant to provide a completed Form 80.

  4. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 17 April 2024 on the basis that the applicant did not meet reg 2.03AA because he did not provide a statement by an appropriate authority in the form of an Australian Federal Police (AFP) National Police Certificate and an Overseas Police Clearance Certificate, when requested to do so.

  5. The applicant sought review of the delegate’s decision on 7 May 2024 and subsequently provided the requested statements.

  6. In reaching its decision the Tribunal did not consider it necessary to hold a hearing, as it was able to find in favour of the applicant on the basis of the material before it, pursuant to         s 360(2)(a) of the Act.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  7. The issue in this case is whether the applicant has provided statements by appropriate authorities that provides evidence about whether or not he has a criminal history.

  8. The Department of Home Affairs wrote to the applicant on 22 February 2024 requesting that he provide an Australian Federal Police (AFP) National Police Certificate and police clearance certificate(s) from each country where he had lived for a total of 12 months or more in the last 10 years. The applicant was given 28 days within which to provide the requested information. The applicant had not provided the requested information at the time the delegate refused to grant the visa.

    Has the applicant provided statement from appropriate authorities?

  9. The applicant submitted an AFP Digital National Police Certificate dated 10 February 2024 with his review application made on 7 May 2024.

  10. On 14 June 2014, the Tribunal wrote to the applicant requesting that he provide police certificates from each country where he had lived for a total of 12 months or more, in the last 10 years

  11. On 28 June 2024, the applicant submitted a French National Criminal Record certificate  (with certified translation) issued on 20 June 2024, and advised that he was also seeking a clearance from New Zealand.

  12. On 9 July 2024, the applicant submitted a Criminal Convictions clearance certificate issued by the New Zealand Ministry of Justice on 4 July 2024.

  13. As the applicant has now provided the requested statements from appropriate authorities, the Tribunal finds that they meet reg 2.03AA(2)(a).

    Conclusion

  14. On the basis of the above findings, the applicant meets reg 2.03AA(2).

    DECISION

  15. The Tribunal remits the application for a Temporary Activity (Class GG) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 408 visa:

    ·Regulation 2.03AA(2).

    Paul Windsor


    Member

Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Natural Justice

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0