Bouchard and Lyall and Ors
[2011] FamCA 1044
•27 July 2011
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| BOUCHARD & LYALL AND ORS | [2011] FamCA 1044 |
| FAMILY LAW – psychiatric assessment |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Bouchard |
| FIRST RESPONDENT: | Mr Lyall |
| SECOND RESPONDENT: | Mr West |
| INTERVENOR: | Department of Human Services |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: |
| FILE NUMBER: | MLC | 6957 | of | 2010 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 27 July 2011 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Melbourne |
| PLACE HEARD: | Melbourne |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Cronin J |
| HEARING DATE: | 27 July 2011 |
REPRESENTATION
| THE APPLICANT: | MS Bouchard appears in person |
COUNSEL FOR THE 1ST RESPONDENT: | Mr Barbayannis |
COUNSEL FOR THE 2ND RESPONDENT: | Ms Steiner |
| COUNSEL FOR THE INTERVENOR: | Ms Buchanan for Dept of Human Services |
| COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Ms Agresta |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Lampe Family Lawyers |
Orders
That Ms Bouchard attend upon Dr D on 20 September 2011 for the purposes of a psychiatric assessment with the cost of such assessment to be funded by Victoria Legal Aid.
That the Independent Children’s Lawyer be at liberty to provide Dr D with the facts concerning the background of the proceeding and such psychiatric and psychological assessments as are considered appropriate providing that Dr D undertakes the assessment of Ms Bouchard without relying on the accuracy of those reports and upon making such assessment as he considers appropriate as to her mental health, sets out any inconsistency in his views with those of previous professionals whose reports are brought to his attention.
That the Independent Children’s Lawyer’s application in a case filed 15 July 2011 is otherwise dismissed.
That the application of the mother in a case filed 20 July 2011 and the response to the application of the Independent Children’s Lawyer referred to are both dismissed.
That the reasons this day be transcribed.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Bouchard & Lyall and Ors is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
FILE NUMBER: MLC 6957 of 2010
| Ms Bouchard |
Applicant
And
| Mr Lyall |
1st Respondent
And
| Mr West |
2nd Respondent
And
| Department of Human Services |
Intervener
Independent Children’s Lawyer
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
For the reasons that will be absolutely clear, I hope, from the discussion we have had over the last hour, I propose to make an order in terms of what the independent children’s lawyer seeks, and to dismiss the application that Ms Bouchard seeks. I do not propose to give comprehensive reasons now, because I think those reasons will be abundantly clear from the discussion that will no doubt appear on the transcript if someone wants to read it.
I do, however, make the following two points: the first is that I am very concerned that there is not an updated psychiatric examination of the mother and, having regard to all of the litigation that has gone on and the allegations that have been made by each of the relevant parties, it seems to me that the Court would be assisted by that report.
In respect of the father’s, the affidavit material provided by Ms Bouchard clearly indicates that there were significant dysfunctional relationship problems. It may even suggest that one or more parties to the various proceedings is not truthful. It may, in fact, show that that particular person has obsessive traits, but it does not strike me as being evidence that would suggest that there’s a mental health problem.
On that basis, I decline to make the order that those two men be psychiatrically examined. I will make orders in those terms. I will rely on the independent children’s lawyer to understand what needs to be done about corresponding with each party, and about the communications that are to go to the psychiatrist.
RECORDED : NOT TRANSCRIBED
Those orders will be published later today.
I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of the Honourable Justice Cronin delivered on 27 July 2011.
Associate:
Date: 11 January 2012
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
0
0
1