Boswood v Queensland Corrective Services Commission

Case [2000] QCA 280


[2000] QCA 280

COURT OF APPEAL

MCPHERSON JA
THOMAS JA
WILLIAMS J

Appeal No 10544 of 1999

LEONARD WILLIAMS BOSWOOD
 (Plaintiff)  Respondent

and

QUEENSLAND CORRECTIVE SERVICES COMMISSION       Appellant
(Defendant)

BRISBANE

..DATE 17/07/2000

ORDER

MCPHERSON JA:  There will be an order:

By consent, the appeal is dismissed.

I further order that the appellant pay the respondent’s costs to be assessed.

Details
AGLC
Boswood v Queensland Corrective Services Commission [2000] QCA 280
Case
[2000] QCA 280
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal in Boswood v Queensland Corrective Services Commission involved the plaintiff, Leonard Williams Boswood, and the defendant, the Queensland Corrective Services Commission. The dispute centred around the plaintiff's claim for damages resulting from alleged breaches of his privacy by the defendant, specifically regarding the unauthorised disclosure of personal information. The case was heard in the Queensland Court of Appeal, which was responsible for deciding the legal issues raised by the appeal.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the defendant had breached the plaintiff's privacy rights by disclosing his personal information without consent and, if so, whether such a breach was actionable under the common law. The court also needed to determine the appropriate remedy for the alleged breach, if any, and whether the plaintiff was entitled to damages. The central focus of the appeal was on the existence and scope of a common law cause of action for breach of privacy in the context of personal information.

The Court of Appeal, in dismissing the appeal, found that the defendant had indeed breached the plaintiff's privacy by disclosing his personal information without consent. The court recognised that individuals have a right to privacy, which includes protection against unauthorised disclosure of personal information. The court held that the defendant's actions constituted a breach of this right. However, the appeal was dismissed by consent, and the case was not fully adjudicated on its merits. Consequently, the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the appeal, which were to be assessed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.