Bosanguet and Bosanguet (Child support)

Link copied
Case Copied 19 min read

Bosanguet and Bosanguet (Child support) [2024] AATA 2767 (4 July 2024)

DIVISION:Social Services & Child Support Division

REVIEW NUMBER:  2024/AC027409

APPLICANT:  Mr Bosanguet

OTHER PARTIES:  Child Support Registrar

Ms Bosanguet

TRIBUNAL:Senior Member S De Bono

DECISION DATE:  04 July 2024

DECISION:

The decision of the objections officer is varied so that, for the period 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024 Mr Bosanguet’s adjusted taxable income is set at $45,000.

CATCHWORDS 
CHILD SUPPORT – change of assessment – ceased to be able to work due to car accident – an unjust and inequitable determination of the level of financial support – a ground for departure is established – adjusted taxable income varied – decision of the objections officer is varied

Names used in all published decisions are pseudonyms. Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been removed from this decision and replaced with generic information so as not to identify involved individuals as required by subsections 16(2AB)-16(2AC) of theChild Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988

REASONS FOR DECISION

BACKGROUND

  1. The issue to be considered in this application is whether there is a reason to change the administrative assessment of child support and, if so, whether it is just and equitable and otherwise proper to do so.

  2. Ms Bosanguet and Mr Bosanguet are the parents of [Child 1]. Ms Bosanguet is recorded as having 75% care and Mr Bosanguet is recorded as having 25% of [Child 1], which has applied to the administrative assessment of child support from 17 January 2020. There has been a child support assessment in place from 2 September 2016. Mr Bosanguet has been the parent liable to pay child support. Child support has been collected from Services Australia (Child Support) from 13 January 2020.

  3. The administrative assessments in place prior to the change of assessment application were as follows:

    ·      For the period 1 September 2022 to 30 June 2023 Mr Bosanguet was assessed to pay child support of $0 (nil) per annum based on his $11,445 2022/2023 estimated income, and the 2021/2022 adjusted taxable income (ATI) of $49,464 for Ms Bosanguet.

    ·      For the period 1 July 2023 to 31 August 2023 Mr Bosanguet was assessed to pay child support of $4,629 per annum based on his 2021/2022 ATI of $60,941 and Ms Bosanguet’s 2021/2022 ATI of $49,464.

    ·      For the period 1 September 2023 to 30 November 2023 Mr Bosanguet was assessed to pay child support of $0 (nil) based on his 2022/2023 provisional income of $8,875 and Ms Bosanguet’s ATI of $47,241 for the 2022/2023 financial year.

  4. On 8 October 2023 Mr Bosanguet applied for a change of assessment on the basis of Reason 8A – that the income, property and financial resources for him were not an accurate reflection of his current situation and, Reason 8B – his earning capacity, on the basis that he had a reduced earning capacity due to injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident in January 2022.

  5. On 4 December 2023 a Delegate of…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Bosanguet and Bosanguet (Child support) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] AATA 2767
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of *Bosanguet and Bosanguet* concerned an application for a change of assessment regarding child support payments. The applicant argued that a change in their circumstances, specifically their inability to work due to a car accident, rendered the existing assessment unjust and inequitable. The case was heard by Senior Member S De Bono.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant's changed circumstances constituted a ground for departure from the standard child support assessment. Specifically, the court had to determine if the inability to work following a car accident made the current level of financial support unjust and inequitable, thereby justifying an adjustment to the assessed taxable income.

Senior Member De Bono found that the applicant's inability to work due to the car accident did indeed establish a ground for departure. The court reasoned that the purpose of child support legislation is to ensure fair and equitable financial arrangements, and a significant, involuntary change in earning capacity due to unforeseen circumstances, such as a serious accident, could lead to an unjust outcome if not addressed. Applying this principle, the court concluded that the adjusted taxable income should be varied to reflect the applicant's reduced capacity to earn. The decision of the objections officer was consequently varied.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.