Bosanguet and Bosanguet (Child support) [2024] AATA 2767 (4 July 2024)
DIVISION:Social Services & Child Support Division
REVIEW NUMBER: 2024/AC027409
APPLICANT: Mr Bosanguet
OTHER PARTIES: Child Support Registrar
Ms Bosanguet
TRIBUNAL:Senior Member S De Bono
DECISION DATE: 04 July 2024
DECISION:
The decision of the objections officer is varied so that, for the period 1 January 2024 to 30 June 2024 Mr Bosanguet’s adjusted taxable income is set at $45,000.
CATCHWORDS
CHILD SUPPORT – change of assessment – ceased to be able to work due to car accident – an unjust and inequitable determination of the level of financial support – a ground for departure is established – adjusted taxable income varied – decision of the objections officer is varied
Names used in all published decisions are pseudonyms. Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been removed from this decision and replaced with generic information so as not to identify involved individuals as required by subsections 16(2AB)-16(2AC) of theChild Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988
REASONS FOR DECISION
BACKGROUND
The issue to be considered in this application is whether there is a reason to change the administrative assessment of child support and, if so, whether it is just and equitable and otherwise proper to do so.
Ms Bosanguet and Mr Bosanguet are the parents of [Child 1]. Ms Bosanguet is recorded as having 75% care and Mr Bosanguet is recorded as having 25% of [Child 1], which has applied to the administrative assessment of child support from 17 January 2020. There has been a child support assessment in place from 2 September 2016. Mr Bosanguet has been the parent liable to pay child support. Child support has been collected from Services Australia (Child Support) from 13 January 2020.
The administrative assessments in place prior to the change of assessment application were as follows:
· For the period 1 September 2022 to 30 June 2023 Mr Bosanguet was assessed to pay child support of $0 (nil) per annum based on his $11,445 2022/2023 estimated income, and the 2021/2022 adjusted taxable income (ATI) of $49,464 for Ms Bosanguet.
· For the period 1 July 2023 to 31 August 2023 Mr Bosanguet was assessed to pay child support of $4,629 per annum based on his 2021/2022 ATI of $60,941 and Ms Bosanguet’s 2021/2022 ATI of $49,464.
· For the period 1 September 2023 to 30 November 2023 Mr Bosanguet was assessed to pay child support of $0 (nil) based on his 2022/2023 provisional income of $8,875 and Ms Bosanguet’s ATI of $47,241 for the 2022/2023 financial year.
On 8 October 2023 Mr Bosanguet applied for a change of assessment on the basis of Reason 8A – that the income, property and financial resources for him were not an accurate reflection of his current situation and, Reason 8B – his earning capacity, on the basis that he had a reduced earning capacity due to injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident in January 2022.
On 4 December 2023 a Delegate of…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Bosanguet and Bosanguet (Child support) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] AATA 2767
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant's changed circumstances constituted a ground for departure from the standard child support assessment. Specifically, the court had to determine if the inability to work following a car accident made the current level of financial support unjust and inequitable, thereby justifying an adjustment to the assessed taxable income.
Senior Member De Bono found that the applicant's inability to work due to the car accident did indeed establish a ground for departure. The court reasoned that the purpose of child support legislation is to ensure fair and equitable financial arrangements, and a significant, involuntary change in earning capacity due to unforeseen circumstances, such as a serious accident, could lead to an unjust outcome if not addressed. Applying this principle, the court concluded that the adjusted taxable income should be varied to reflect the applicant's reduced capacity to earn. The decision of the objections officer was consequently varied.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.