Boros v Watson

Case

[2001] HCATrans 423

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Perth  No P79 of 2000

B e t w e e n -

BELA BOROS

Applicant

and

RANDALL WATSON

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

McHUGH J
CALLINAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT PERTH ON THURSDAY, 25 OCTOBER 2001, AT 10.18 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

McHUGH J:   The Deputy Registrar has certified that the applicant in this matter will not be presenting oral argument in support of the application.  The Deputy Registrar has also certified that she has been informed by the solicitor for the respondent that the respondent does not wish to be represented at the hearing of the application for special leave and will submit to the order of the Court save as to costs.

The Court has read all the material filed in this matter.  The Court is of the view that there is nothing about the case that would warrant the grant of special leave to appeal and that there is no reason to doubt the correctness of the judgment against which special leave is sought.  The application is dismissed.

Adjourn the Court.

AT 10.20 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Negligence & Tort

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Causation

  • Damages

  • Duty of Care

  • Negligence

  • Reliance

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0