| [2015] FWCA 5573 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Boroondara City Council
(AG2015/3716)
BOROONDARA CITY COUNCIL LOCAL LAWS EMPLOYEES’ AGREEMENT NO. 6, 2015
Local government administration | |
COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 13 AUGUST 2015 |
Application for approval of the Boroondara City Council Local Laws Employees’ Agreement No. 6, 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Boroondara City Council Local Laws Employees’ Agreement No. 6, 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Boroondara City Council. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 13 August 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 August 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE415239 PR570793>
- AGLC
- Boroondara City Council [2015] FWCA 5573
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5573
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the statutory framework governing the approval of local government employee agreements, including the Local Government Act 1989 (Vic). It considered whether the agreement adhered to the prescribed legislative requirements and whether the process of its creation was in accordance with good faith bargaining principles. The court also assessed whether the council had adequately consulted with the trade unions and whether the union's concerns were appropriately addressed. The court found that the council had generally complied with the legislative requirements and had engaged in good faith bargaining, notwithstanding some procedural shortcomings. The court concluded that these shortcomings did not undermine the validity of the agreement.
Upon review of the evidence and the applicable legal standards, the court determined that the proposed agreement was valid and should be approved. The court acknowledged the council's efforts to negotiate in good faith and to consult with the unions, notwithstanding the minor procedural lapses. The union's objections were not deemed sufficient to invalidate the agreement. Consequently, the court granted the council's application for approval of the Local Laws Employees’ Agreement No. 6, 2015. The final orders of the court mandated that the agreement be approved and implemented as per the council's proposed terms, subject to the statutory framework and procedural fairness requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.