Bonnie Miller v CXC Global

Case [2023] FWC 2500


[2023] FWC 2500

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Bonnie Miller
v

CXC Global

(U2023/7308)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 3 OCTOBER 2023

Application for relief from unfair dismissal – minimum employment period – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative

  1. On 8 August 2023 Bonnie Miller (the Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. The Applicant advised in the Form F2 Unfair Dismissal Application (Form F2) that she commenced employment with CXC Global on 11 April 2023 and that her dismissal took effect on 7 August 2023.

  1. On 16 August 2023, the Commission emailed correspondence to the Applicant’s nominated email address advising that, on the basis of the information provided in the Form F2, she had not served the minimum employment period. The correspondence directed the Applicant to file any documents or other evidence to support her claim that she had served the required minimum employment period. This correspondence also warned that if she did not contact the Commission within 14 days, the application may be dismissed without further notice. An SMS notification was also sent to the Applicant’s nominated telephone number requesting that she contact the Commission.

  1. As no further correspondence was received, on 28 August 2023, the Commission attempted to contact the Applicant on her nominated telephone number. However, she could not be reached. A voicemail message was left advising the matter was at risk of being dismissed.

  1. On 6 September 2023, the Commission made a further attempt to contact the Applicant on her nominated telephone number. The call was not answered, and a voicemail message was left advising the matter was at risk of being dismissed.

  1. To date, the Applicant has not provided any further correspondence to the Commission.

  1. Section 382 of the FW Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment. I am satisfied the Applicant has not completed the required minimum employment period.

  1. Section 383 of the FW Act sets out the minimum employment period as follows:

383 Meaning of minimum employment period

The minimum employment period is:

(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:

(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;
(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or

(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. As the Applicant has not completed the required minimum employment period under the FW Act the application has no reasonable prospect of success. As such, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act.

COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR766657>

Details
AGLC
Bonnie Miller v CXC Global [2023] FWC 2500
Case
[2023] FWC 2500
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Bonnie Miller, the applicant, filed a complaint with the Fair Work Commission for unfair dismissal under section 394 of the Fair Work Act 2009. CXC Global, her former employer, was the respondent. Miller alleged that she was dismissed on August 7, 2023, after only four months of employment, which began on April 11, 2023. The Commission was asked to provide relief for the unfair dismissal.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether Miller had served the requisite minimum employment period, as stipulated under section 383 of the Fair Work Act, and whether her application had a reasonable chance of success. The minimum employment period is six months for employers who are not small businesses and one year for small businesses. Given that CXC Global was not a small business, Miller needed to have been employed for at least six months to be eligible for protection against unfair dismissal.

The Commission reviewed the information provided by Miller and found that she had not completed the required six-month employment period, as she was dismissed within four months. Section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act empowers the Commission to dismiss an application if it has no reasonable prospect of success. Since Miller did not meet the minimum employment requirement, the application had no reasonable prospect of success. The Commission dismissed the application on these grounds.

The Fair Work Commission dismissed Bonnie Miller's application for relief from unfair dismissal, concluding that she had not completed the requisite minimum employment period of six months. The dismissal was made under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act, as the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.