BOND -v- JOHN FAIRFAX PUBLICATIONS PTY LTD & ANOR [2001] WASC 336
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2001] WASC 336 | |
| Case No: | CIV:1650/2000 | 22 NOVEMBER 2001 | |
| Coram: | McLURE J | 14/12/01 | |
| 8 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Application successful in part | ||
| B | |||
| PDF Version |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
- IN CHAMBERS
- Plaintiff
AND
JOHN FAIRFAX PUBLICATIONS PTY LTD (ACN 003 357 720)
First Defendant
MARK DRUMMOND
Second Defendant
Catchwords:
Defamation - Application to strike out defence - Extension of time to make application - True innuendo - Particulars of justification - Turns on own facts
Legislation:
Supreme Court Rules
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Bond v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2001] WASC 336
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The main legal issues were whether the plaintiff was entitled to an extension of time to make the application, and if certain paragraphs of the defence were to be struck out. The court considered whether the plaintiff's delay in making the application could be justified and whether the defence contained any untenable or manifestly groundless imputations.
The court found that the plaintiff's delay in making the application could be partially justified, as the merits of the strike-out application were a material consideration. The court also found that paragraph 4 of the defence was arguable and should not be struck out, but paragraph 5 was unclear and potentially prejudicial to the plaintiff. The court granted the plaintiff an extension of time to bring the application and ordered that paragraph 5 of the defence be struck out with the defendant being given leave to replead.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.