Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BOND CORPORATION HOLDINGS LTD v AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING COMMISSION [1989] NSWCA 22 Decision date: 28 June 1989
See Attachment (PDF)
Details
- AGLC
- Bond Corporation Holdings Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Commission [1989] NSWCA 22
- Case
- [1989] NSWCA 22
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Bond Corporation Holdings Ltd (Bond Corp) appealed to the New South Wales Court of Appeal against a decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The dispute concerned the publication of certain statements by the Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC) which Bond Corp alleged were defamatory. Bond Corp sought to restrain the ABC from further publishing these statements and claimed damages for the harm caused to its reputation.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the statements published by the ABC were capable of bearing a defamatory meaning concerning Bond Corp, and if so, whether they were in fact defamatory. The court also had to consider whether the ABC could rely on any defences, such as justification or qualified privilege, in relation to the statements.
The Court of Appeal, in its reasoning, analysed the meaning of the words published by the ABC in their ordinary and natural sense, considering the context in which they appeared. The court applied the established legal principles for determining defamation, including the test of whether the words would tend to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking members of society. The court found that certain statements were capable of being defamatory and that the defence of justification was not made out.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, finding that some of the statements were defamatory and that the ABC had failed to establish a defence. The court made orders restraining further publication of the defamatory material and remitted the assessment of damages to the Supreme Court.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the statements published by the ABC were capable of bearing a defamatory meaning concerning Bond Corp, and if so, whether they were in fact defamatory. The court also had to consider whether the ABC could rely on any defences, such as justification or qualified privilege, in relation to the statements.
The Court of Appeal, in its reasoning, analysed the meaning of the words published by the ABC in their ordinary and natural sense, considering the context in which they appeared. The court applied the established legal principles for determining defamation, including the test of whether the words would tend to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking members of society. The court found that certain statements were capable of being defamatory and that the defence of justification was not made out.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, finding that some of the statements were defamatory and that the ABC had failed to establish a defence. The court made orders restraining further publication of the defamatory material and remitted the assessment of damages to the Supreme Court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.