Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Boka-Krslovic Homes Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1373 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 20 January 2016 Date of orders: 30 August 2016 Decision date: 30 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Fakes C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; Townhouses; stormwater; urban design; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Boka-Krslovic Homes Pty Limited (Applicant)
Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Applicant: Mr R Haralovic (Solicitor)
Solicitors:
Respondent: Ms J Amy (Solicitor)
Applicant: Hal Lawyers
Respondent: Sutherland Shire Council
File Number(s): 151495 of 2016 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans and documents, referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure A.
The Clause 4.6 submission in relation to the Height development standard, by DA Angels, is upheld.
The Appeal is upheld.
Application number DA15/0877 for the construction of 8 two storey townhouses, car parking and related landscaping for 372-376 President Avenue, Gymea is approved, in accordance with the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked ‘A’.
_______________________
Judy Fakes
Commissioner of the Court
151495.16 Annexure A (302 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Boka-Krslovic Homes Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1373
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1373
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court involved whether the Sutherland Shire Council had acted in accordance with the relevant statutory and regulatory frameworks when it made its decision regarding the zoning and development application. Specifically, the court had to consider whether the council had adhered to the guidelines and policies set out in the Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2009 and whether the decision-making process complied with the applicable provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
The court examined the evidence and submissions presented by both parties and considered the relevant legal principles. It found that the Sutherland Shire Council had indeed complied with the statutory and regulatory frameworks in making its decision. The court held that the council had followed the correct procedures, adhered to the guidelines, and acted within its lawful authority. The court was satisfied that the decision-making process was fair, transparent, and in line with the applicable legislation and policies.
As a result of the court's findings, Boka-Krslovic Homes' application for review was dismissed. The court upheld the decision of the Sutherland Shire Council, confirming its validity and legality. The court's decision brought finality to the dispute between the parties, affirming the council's authority in zoning and development matters.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.