FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Boensch v Pascoe [2016] FCA 1104
File number: NSD 1448 of 2016 Judge: ALLSOP CJ Date of judgment: 5 September 2016 Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY- application for an extension of time to appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales-where the New South Wales Court of Appeal held pursuant to the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) that only the Full Court of the Federal Court can hear the appeal-orders made that application for extension of time be heard at the same time as conditional application for security for costs Legislation: Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth), ss 7, 7(2) Cases cited: Boensch v Pascoe [2016] NSWCA 191
Franz Boensch as Trustee of the Boensch Trust v Scott Darren Pascoe [2015] NSWSC 1882
Date of hearing: 5 September 2016 Registry: New South Wales Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 9 Counsel for Applicant: Mr C J Bevan Solicitor for Applicant: Madison Marcus Counsel for Respondent: Mr M F Newton Solicitor for Respondent: Gilchrist Connell ORDERS
NSD 1448 of 2016 BETWEEN: FRANZ BOENSCH AS TRUSTEE OF THE BOENSCH TRUST
Applicant
AND: SCOTT DARREN PASCOE
Respondent
JUDGE:
ALLSOP CJ
DATE OF ORDER:
5 SEPTEMBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The conditional application for security be heard at the same time as the application for an extension of time.
2.The parties be at liberty to file and serve documents that were used or prepared to be used in the Court of Appeal without the need to rework them in Federal Court form. The parties decide jointly on how to file the documents with a view to minimising costs and whether they require a dispensation in relation to the electronic filing of those documents.
3.The conditional application for security for costs and any evidence and submissions in support of it be filed and served within seven days.
4.The respondent to that application, the putative appellant on appeal, file and serve any evidence and submissions on the security for costs application within seven days thereafter.
5.The respondent to the extension of time application file and serve any submissions and evidence in relation to that application within 14 days.
6.The matter be referred to the docket of Justice Gleeson.
7.The parties are to liaise with the chambers of Justice Gleeson as soon as practicable to set a date for the hearing of the security for costs and extension of time applications.
8.In relation to the extension of time application and the security for costs application, Justice Gleeson as docket judge, having heard and disposed of those applications to the extent appropriate or necessary, will make case management orders for the preparation of appeal books and submissions in the substantive appeal, should that become necessary, with a view, to the extent possible, of having the matter heard in the February sittings.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32…
Continue reading Boensch v Pascoe
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Boensch v Pascoe [2016] FCA 1104
- Case
- [2016] FCA 1104
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered what orders were appropriate to manage the applications. The court determined that the security for costs application should be heard at the same time as the extension of time application. The court ordered that the parties could use documents used or prepared for the Court of Appeal without reworking them, to minimise costs. The court also ordered a timetable for the filing and serving of documents in relation to the applications. The matter was referred to the docket of Justice Gleeson who was to make further orders as necessary to prepare for a substantive appeal.
The court ordered that the conditional application for security for costs and any evidence and submissions in support of it be filed and served within seven days. The respondent to that application was to file and serve any evidence and submissions on the security for costs application within seven days thereafter. The respondent to the extension of time application was to file and serve any submissions and evidence in relation to that application within 14 days. The parties were to liaise with the chambers of Justice Gleeson to set a date for the hearing of the applications. Justice Gleeson was to make further case management orders for the preparation of appeal books and submissions in the substantive appeal, should that become necessary, with a view to having the matter heard in the February sittings.
Justice Gleeson made orders for the filing and serving of documents and set a date for the hearing of the applications. The court made further orders to facilitate the preparation of appeal books and submissions for the substantive appeal, should that become necessary.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The conditional application for security be heard at the same time as the application for an extension of time.
2. The parties be at liberty to file and serve documents that were used or prepared to be used in the Court of Appeal without the need to rework them in Federal Court form. The parties decide jointly on how to file the documents with a view to minimising costs and whether they require a dispensation in relation to the electronic filing of those documents.
3. The conditional application for security for costs and any evidence and submissions in support of it be filed and served within seven days.
4. The respondent to that application, the putative appellant on appeal, file and serve any evidence and submissions on the security for costs application within seven days thereafter.
5. The respondent to the extension of time application file and serve any submissions and evidence in relation to that application within 14 days.
6. The matter be referred to the docket of Justice Gleeson.
7. The parties are to liaise with the chambers of Justice Gleeson as soon as practicable to set a date for the hearing of the security for costs and extension of time applications.
8. In relation to the extension of time application and the security for costs application, Justice Gleeson as docket judge, having heard and disposed of those applications to the extent appropriate or necessary, will make case management orders for the preparation of appeal books and submissions in the substantive appeal, should that become necessary, with a view, to the extent possible, of having the matter heard in the February sittings.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.