| [2020] FWCA 4890 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
BOC Limited
(AG2020/2396)
BOC LIMITED LUTANA (OPERATIONS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI | MELBOURNE, 11 SEPTEMBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the BOC Limited Lutana (Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] BOC Limited has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the BOC Limited Lutana (Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).
[2] Since the application was made, the Commission raised concerns about the form of the application and whether the pre-approval requirements were met. Further information was provided in relation to these concerns.
[3] The Applicant sought to correct a typographical error in the original application, by filing an amended Agreement. In the circumstances, I am satisfied that this amendment should be allowed and that it is appropriate to do so pursuant to s.586 of the Act.
[4] I am not satisfied that the Applicant took all reasonable steps to provide employees to be covered with access to, or give them a copy of, the incorporated Award as required by s.180(2) and the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (Notice) issued at the commencement of bargaining was not strictly compliant with the requirements of s.174 because it included minor modification to the prescribed content. The Notice was otherwise compliant in all respects. In the circumstances and having regard to the decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited t/a RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics and Others 1, I am satisfied that:
a) these constitute minor procedural or technical errors for the purposes of s.188(2)(a); and
b) the employees to be covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by these errors.
[5] Accordingly, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act.
[6] Noting clause 12(b) of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards in the Act (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[7] On the basis of the material contained in the amended application and related materials, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[8] The "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[9] The Agreement was approved on 11 September 2020 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 18 September 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE508994 PR722716>
- AGLC
- BOC Limited [2020] FWCA 4890
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 4890
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission involved the interpretation and compliance of the enterprise agreement with the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. The Commission had to assess whether the agreement met the criteria for approval, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and whether it was consistent with the provisions of the Act and Regulations. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and whether it provided for a fair and efficient industrial relations environment.
The Commission found that the enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements for approval. It determined that the agreement was fairly and reasonably negotiated and that the terms and conditions provided for were consistent with the legislative framework. The Commission noted that the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable, and it did not identify any provisions that would render the agreement unfair or unreasonable. Consequently, the Commission approved the BOC Limited Lutana (Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2020.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.