Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bobalas v Waverley Council [2014] NSWCA 66 Hearing dates: 14 March 2014 Decision date: 14 March 2014 Before: Schmidt J Decision: Orders made by Biscoe J in the Land and Environment Court on 4 March 2014 in matter number 40466/13 - Waverley Council v Bobolas be stayed until further order of the Court. For that purpose, the matter is listed at 2pm on Monday, 17 March before the Court for further hearing of the motion
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Catchwords: PROCEDURE - notice of motion - ex parte application - order restraining the Council from entering premises - order made in Land and Environment Court stayed until further order of the Court Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Elena Bobalas (First Appellant)
Liana Bobalas (Second Appellant)
Mary Bobalas (Third Appellant)Representation: Solicitors:
Elena Bobalas, unrepresented
(First Appellant)
Liana Bobalas, unrepresented
(Second Appellant)
Mary Bobalas, unrepresented
(Third Appellant)
File Number(s): 2014/80335 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal
- Date of Decision:
- 2014-03-04 00:00:00
- Before:
- Biscoe J
- File Number(s):
- 2014/40466
EX TEMPORE Judgment
HER HONOUR: This evening a notice of appeal has been filed by three appellants, Elena Bobalas, Liana Bobalas and Mary Bobalas. They seek to appeal a judgment given on 4 March 2014 by Biscoe J in the Land and Environment Court, in circumstances where they allege, due to ill health, they did not appear at a hearing before his Honour on that day, when orders were made pursuant to which Waverley Council has been given permission to enter into their home and undertake certain work described in the orders made by his Honour.
By notice of motion also filed today, the appellants seek an order restraining the Council from entering into their home in accordance with his Honour's orders and a stay of those orders until their appeal is heard.
The appellants have approached the Court ex parte, in circumstances which they have explained include having approached the Land and Environment Court on 11 March to enquire as to what had transpired at the hearing before Biscoe J. Registry staff provided them with a document containing 12 printed orders which they understand his Honour made.
Those orders contemplate that the Council have access to their home on 17, 18, 19, 20 March and 21 March to undertake certain works. Order 6 is in these terms:
"Provided a sealed copy of these orders are served on the respondents by affixing the orders in a sealed, clear, soft plastic pocket to the outside of the double front gates of the premises, three days before the works commence, the works…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Bobolas v Waverley Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] NSWCA 66
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before Justice Schmidt was whether the orders made by Justice Biscoe in the Land and Environment Court should be stayed pending further determination. This required the Court to consider the circumstances under which an ex parte order could be challenged and the principles governing the grant of a stay of proceedings.
Justice Schmidt reasoned that the orders made by Justice Biscoe should be stayed until further order of the Court. The Court listed the matter for a further hearing to consider the motion. The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, specifically Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17, and 36.18, govern the setting aside and variation of judgments and orders, including a fourteen-day time limit for certain applications.
The Court ordered that the orders made by Justice Biscoe in the Land and Environment Court on 4 March 2014 be stayed until further order. The matter was subsequently listed for a further hearing on 17 March.
Orders
Orders of the court
Orders made by Biscoe J in the Land and Environment Court on 4 March 2014 in matter number 40466/13 - Waverley Council v Bobolas be stayed until further order of the Court. For that purpose, the matter is listed at 2pm on Monday, 17 March before the Court for further hearing of the motion
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.