Bobolas v Waverley Council

Link copied
Case Copied 4 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Bobalas v Waverley Council [2014] NSWCA 66
Hearing dates:14 March 2014
Decision date: 14 March 2014
Before: Schmidt J
Decision:

Orders made by Biscoe J in the Land and Environment Court on 4 March 2014 in matter number 40466/13 - Waverley Council v Bobolas be stayed until further order of the Court. For that purpose, the matter is listed at 2pm on Monday, 17 March before the Court for further hearing of the motion

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Catchwords: PROCEDURE - notice of motion - ex parte application - order restraining the Council from entering premises - order made in Land and Environment Court stayed until further order of the Court
Category:Interlocutory applications
Parties: Elena Bobalas (First Appellant)
Liana Bobalas (Second Appellant)
Mary Bobalas (Third Appellant)
Representation: Solicitors:
Elena Bobalas, unrepresented
(First Appellant)
Liana Bobalas, unrepresented
(Second Appellant)
Mary Bobalas, unrepresented
(Third Appellant)
File Number(s):2014/80335
Publication restriction:None
 Decision under appeal 
Date of Decision:
2014-03-04 00:00:00
Before:
Biscoe J
File Number(s):
2014/40466

EX TEMPORE Judgment

  1. HER HONOUR: This evening a notice of appeal has been filed by three appellants, Elena Bobalas, Liana Bobalas and Mary Bobalas. They seek to appeal a judgment given on 4 March 2014 by Biscoe J in the Land and Environment Court, in circumstances where they allege, due to ill health, they did not appear at a hearing before his Honour on that day, when orders were made pursuant to which Waverley Council has been given permission to enter into their home and undertake certain work described in the orders made by his Honour.

  1. By notice of motion also filed today, the appellants seek an order restraining the Council from entering into their home in accordance with his Honour's orders and a stay of those orders until their appeal is heard.

  1. The appellants have approached the Court ex parte, in circumstances which they have explained include having approached the Land and Environment Court on 11 March to enquire as to what had transpired at the hearing before Biscoe J. Registry staff provided them with a document containing 12 printed orders which they understand his Honour made.

  1. Those orders contemplate that the Council have access to their home on 17, 18, 19, 20 March and 21 March to undertake certain works. Order 6 is in these terms:

"Provided a sealed copy of these orders are served on the respondents by affixing the orders in a sealed, clear, soft plastic pocket to the outside of the double front gates of the premises, three days before the works commence, the works…
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Bobolas v Waverley Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2014] NSWCA 66
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Justice Schmidt considered a motion brought by Bobolas concerning orders made by Justice Biscoe in the Land and Environment Court. The dispute involved an ex parte application by Waverley Council that resulted in an order restraining the Council from entering certain premises. Bobolas sought to have these orders stayed.

The primary legal issue before Justice Schmidt was whether the orders made by Justice Biscoe in the Land and Environment Court should be stayed pending further determination. This required the Court to consider the circumstances under which an ex parte order could be challenged and the principles governing the grant of a stay of proceedings.

Justice Schmidt reasoned that the orders made by Justice Biscoe should be stayed until further order of the Court. The Court listed the matter for a further hearing to consider the motion. The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, specifically Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17, and 36.18, govern the setting aside and variation of judgments and orders, including a fourteen-day time limit for certain applications.

The Court ordered that the orders made by Justice Biscoe in the Land and Environment Court on 4 March 2014 be stayed until further order. The matter was subsequently listed for a further hearing on 17 March.

Orders

Orders of the court

Orders made by Biscoe J in the Land and Environment Court on 4 March 2014 in matter number 40466/13 - Waverley Council v Bobolas be stayed until further order of the Court. For that purpose, the matter is listed at 2pm on Monday, 17 March before the Court for further hearing of the motion

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.