BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster & Anor - [2019] HCATrans 94

[2019] HCATrans 094

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
Sydney No S102 of 2019

B e t w e e n -
BMW AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 004 675 129
Applicant
and
OWEN BREWSTER
First Respondent
REGENCY FUNDING PTY LTD ACN 619 012 421
Second Respondent

GORDON J
EDELMAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON WEDNESDAY, 15 MAY 2019, AT 9.33 AM

GORDON J: In this application, Justice Edelman and I order that special leave to appeal is granted. The parties will be contacted about estimates of time for the hearing of the matter. The parties will also be made aware of the directions necessary for undertaking the appeal.

AT 9.33 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster & Anor and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2019] HCATrans 94
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

BMW Australia Ltd and Regency Funding Pty Ltd were parties to an application before the High Court of Australia. The nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided transcript, which records only the granting of special leave to appeal.

The High Court, constituted by Justices Gordon and Edelman, was required to determine whether to grant special leave to appeal. This involves assessing whether the case raises a question of law that is of general public importance or is necessary to resolve differences of opinion between courts.

The Court granted special leave to appeal, indicating that it considered the matter to be of sufficient importance to warrant a full hearing. The reasoning behind this decision is not elaborated upon in the transcript. The Court indicated that further directions regarding the conduct of the appeal, including time estimates for the hearing, would be communicated to the parties.

Orders