FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 1)
Blaxland & Blaxland [2023] FedCFamC1F 240
File number: LNC 187 of 2021 Judgment of: MCGUIRE J Date of judgment: 6 April 2023 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW - PROPERTY – When property pool is extensive in content and of substantial value – Long marriage – Where parties agree equal contributions and no adjustments for s 79(4)(d)-(g) considerations – Dispute as to “add-backs” to the pool – Dispute as to distribution of assets Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 75(2), 79(2) and 79(4)(b)-(g) Cases cited: AJO & GRO (2005) FLC 93-218
Jabour & Jabour (2019) FLC 93-898
R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248
Stanford & Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108
Townsend & Townsend (1995) FLC 92-569
Division: Division 1 First Instance Number of paragraphs: 65 Date of last submissions: Written submissions 27 February 2023 Date of hearing: 7, 8, 9 and 11 March 2022 and 9, 10 and 11 January 2023 Place: Launceston delivered in Hobart Counsel for the Applicant: Andrea Trezise Solicitor for the Applicant: Andrea Trezise Barrister & Solicitor Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Hall Solicitor for the Respondent: John Munro & Associates ORDERS
LNC 187 of 2021 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN: MS BLAXLAND
Applicant
AND: MR BLAXLAND
Respondent
order made by:
MCGUIRE J
DATE OF ORDER:
6 April 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.For the purpose of these orders IT IS DECLARED THAT:
(a)the parties’ matrimonial assets and liabilities are set out in “Annexure A” hereto (“the Balance Sheet/Asset Distribution Schedule”);
(b)the assets are valued as stated in the Balance Sheet/Asset Distribution Schedule;
(c)the amounts owed at items 96 to 102 of the Balance Sheet/Asset Distribution Schedule may fluctuate prior to the Settlement Date, subject to the injunction against drawdowns set out in Order 4(b) below;
(d)Orders 2 and 3 of the Orders of 26 March 2021 and Order 8 of the Orders of 10 January 2023 (as amended) remain in full force and effect for the period up to and concluding upon the Settlement Date as later defined herein and then discharged, with liabilities of the types described in those orders that fell due and payable on or before the Settlement date to remain a liability of and be paid by B Pty Ltd.
2.Within 60 days of the date of these orders (“the Settlement Date”):
(a)Mr Blaxland (“the husband”) do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as may be required to transfer to Ms Blaxland (“the wife”) all his right, title and interest in items numbered 4 to 42 of the Balance Sheet/Asset Distribution Schedule;
(b)the wife do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as may be required to transfer to the husband all her right, title and interest in items numbered 43 to 73 of the Balance Sheet/Asset Distribution Schedule; and
(c)the wife pay to the husband the sum of $1,334,405 (“the Settlement Payment”).
3.Contemporaneously with the performance…
Continue reading Blaxland & Blaxland
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Blaxland & Blaxland [2023] FedCFamC1F 240
- Case
- [2023] FedCFamC1F 240
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that it was just and equitable to alter the property interests of the parties. The court found that the wife had made significant contributions to the marriage, both financially and in terms of managing the family's finances. The court also found that the husband had made significant contributions to the marriage, both in terms of his work on the construction side of the business and his contributions to the family. The court found that the amount to be added back to the property for the legal costs already paid by the wife should be based on the contributions made by each party to the marriage and the assets they had accumulated during the marriage. The court found that the wife's contributions to the marriage were significant and that the amount to be added back to the property should reflect those contributions.
The court ordered that the amount to be added back to the property for the legal costs already paid by the wife should be determined by the contributions made by each party to the marriage and the assets they had accumulated during the marriage. The court ordered that the amount to be added back should be calculated by taking into account the value of the assets owned by the parties at the time of the separation, as well as the contributions made by each party to the acquisition of those assets. The court also ordered that the amount to be added back should be reduced by any amounts paid by the wife for her legal costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.