Blacktown City Council v Wilkie

Case [2001] NSWLEC 161


Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Blacktown City Council v Wilkie and Ors [2001] NSWLEC 161
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Blacktown City Council

RESPONDENTS
Wilkie and Ors
FILE NUMBER(S): 40025 of 2001
CORAM: Pearlman J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- joinder
LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Rules 1970 pt 8 r 8
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 10/07/2001
EX TEMPORE
JUDGMENT DATE :

07/10/2001
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


APPLICANT
Mr D R Parry (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Houston Dearn O'Connor

FIRST RESPONDENT
in person
SOLICITORS
N/A

SECOND AND THIRD RESPONDENTS
Mr R W Killalea (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Low & Associates


JUDGMENT:

IN THE LAND AND 40025 of 2001
ENVIRONMENT COURT

Pearlman J


OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10 July 2001
BLACKTOWN CITY COUNCIL
                              Applicant
v
MISTY WILKIE
                              First Respondent

MARK REID trading as GRAVEYARD RECYCLING and


THE GRAVEYARD RECYCLING

                              Second Respondent
GRAVEYARD RECYCLING PTY LTD

                              Third Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The second application today is made by Ms Wilkie, who seeks the joinder of the registered proprietor of the land, a Mr Constantine, who has furnished some affidavits, two affidavits I think, in the council’s case.

2. The Court has power to join another party as a respondent under pt 8 r 8 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970. However, I am not prepared to grant that application. This case has been on foot for a long time. Ms Wilkie has known about the proceedings. The case has been set down for hearing once before and again for hearing today.

3. An application for joinder should not be made at the heel of the hunt. It should be made well ahead. In any event, I accept the submission of Mr Parry, for the council, that the joinder sought will make no difference because the orders, if any orders are made, will be made jointly and severally on all respondents. Hence I see no pressing reason why it is necessary to join Mr Constantine to these proceedings to rectify a breach of the law, and for that reason I dismiss that application.

Details
AGLC
Blacktown City Council v Wilkie [2001] NSWLEC 161
Case
[2001] NSWLEC 161
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Blacktown City Council initiated proceedings against Misty Wilkie and two other respondents in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The primary dispute centred on alleged breaches of environmental regulations, specifically concerning a recycling operation on the property. The council sought to enforce compliance and address the environmental concerns arising from the operation. During the proceedings, Misty Wilkie made an application to join the registered proprietor of the land, Mr Constantine, as a respondent, citing his involvement in the property and the potential relevance of his affidavits to the council's case.

The court was tasked with determining whether Mr Constantine should be joined as a respondent in the proceedings. The legal issue centred on the appropriate timing and necessity of joining a new party in ongoing litigation, particularly under the provisions of Part 8, Rule 8 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970. The court had to weigh the arguments for and against the joinder, considering the potential impact on the proceedings and the principle that applications for joinder should ideally be made well in advance of the hearing.

Pearlman J dismissed the application to join Mr Constantine as a respondent. The judge noted that the proceedings had been ongoing for some time, and Misty Wilkie had been aware of the litigation. The court observed that the application to join Mr Constantine came at a late stage, which was not conducive to fair and efficient judicial processes. Furthermore, the judge accepted the council's submission that any orders, if granted, would be made jointly and severally against all respondents. Consequently, the court concluded that there was no pressing reason to join Mr Constantine, given that the outcome would not be materially affected by his inclusion in the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.