Blacktown City Council v Wilkie

Case

[2001] NSWLEC 161

07/10/2001

No judgment structure available for this case.

Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Blacktown City Council v Wilkie and Ors [2001] NSWLEC 161
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Blacktown City Council

RESPONDENTS
Wilkie and Ors
FILE NUMBER(S): 40025 of 2001
CORAM: Pearlman J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- joinder
LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Rules 1970 pt 8 r 8
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 10/07/2001
EX TEMPORE
JUDGMENT DATE :

07/10/2001
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


APPLICANT
Mr D R Parry (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Houston Dearn O'Connor

FIRST RESPONDENT
in person
SOLICITORS
N/A

SECOND AND THIRD RESPONDENTS
Mr R W Killalea (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Low & Associates


JUDGMENT:

IN THE LAND AND 40025 of 2001
ENVIRONMENT COURT

Pearlman J


OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10 July 2001
BLACKTOWN CITY COUNCIL
                              Applicant
v
MISTY WILKIE
                              First Respondent

MARK REID trading as GRAVEYARD RECYCLING and


THE GRAVEYARD RECYCLING

                              Second Respondent
GRAVEYARD RECYCLING PTY LTD

                              Third Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The second application today is made by Ms Wilkie, who seeks the joinder of the registered proprietor of the land, a Mr Constantine, who has furnished some affidavits, two affidavits I think, in the council’s case.

2. The Court has power to join another party as a respondent under pt 8 r 8 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970. However, I am not prepared to grant that application. This case has been on foot for a long time. Ms Wilkie has known about the proceedings. The case has been set down for hearing once before and again for hearing today.

3. An application for joinder should not be made at the heel of the hunt. It should be made well ahead. In any event, I accept the submission of Mr Parry, for the council, that the joinder sought will make no difference because the orders, if any orders are made, will be made jointly and severally on all respondents. Hence I see no pressing reason why it is necessary to join Mr Constantine to these proceedings to rectify a breach of the law, and for that reason I dismiss that application.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1