BKCZ and Child Support Registrar (Child support second review)

This matter concerned a second review of a child support assessment by the Child Support Registrar, brought before the court by the applicant, BKCZ, against the Child Support Registrar. The dispute centred on the Registrar's decision to depart from the standard child support formula assessment, which had been previously reviewed.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Registrar had erred in departing from the standard child support assessment, and if so, whether the court should substitute its own assessment or remit the matter back to the Registrar. Specifically, the court had to consider the application of section 117 of the *Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1998* (Cth), which permits departure from the standard assessment in certain circumstances, and the principles governing the exercise of such discretion.

The court's reasoning focused on the evidence presented regarding the capacity of the parties and the needs of the child. It applied the principles established in case law concerning the interpretation and application of section 117, emphasising that a departure from the standard assessment requires compelling reasons and that the court must be satisfied that the departure is just and equitable. The court considered whether the Registrar had properly weighed all relevant factors, including the financial circumstances of both parents and the best interests of the child, in reaching their decision.

Ultimately, the court found that the Registrar had not erred in their decision to depart from the standard assessment. Consequently, the court made orders affirming the Registrar's decision and dismissed the application for review.