Biron Capital Limited v Anstee - [2005] FMCA 1100

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BIRON CAPITAL LIMITED v ANSTEE

[2005] FMCA 1100

BANKRUPTCY – Creditor’s petition – petition opposed on the basis that the creditor holds security of greater value than the debt – creditor giving the security a nil value – that value a genuine one – petition granted.

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s.44
Bankruptcy Regulations
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Re Button; ex parte Voss (1905) 1 KB 602
Re O’Leary; ex parte Bayne (1985) 61 ALR 674
Re Scott; ex parte Moore [1892] 2 BCNSW 55

Applicant:

BIRON CAPITAL LIMITED

Respondent:

BARRY FRANCIS ANSTEE

File Number:

SYG876 of 2005

Judgment of:

Driver FM

Hearing date:

28 July 2005

Delivered at:

Sydney

Delivered on:

28 July 2005

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr M Cohen

Solicitors for the Applicant:

Gadens Lawyers

The respondent appeared in person

ORDERS

A sequestration order be made against the estate of Barry Francis Anstee.
The applicant creditor’s costs, including reserved costs if any, be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
The Court notes that a copy of these orders is to be given to the Official Receiver in Sydney within two days after the orders are entered.
The Court notes that the date of the act of bankruptcy is 22 February 2005.
The Court notes that consent to act as trustee has been signed by Maxwell William Prentice and has been lodged with the Official Receiver in Sydney.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYG876 of 2005

BIRON CAPITAL LIMITED

Applicant

And

BARRY FRANCIS ANSTEE

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(revised from transcript)

I have before me a creditor’s petition filed on 10 June 2005 seeking a sequestration order against the estate of Barry Francis Anstee. The petition is supported by the following material: an affidavit by John Corr filed on 11 April 2005, a supplementary affidavit by Mr Corr filed by leave in court today, an affidavit of Michael McEwen also filed on 11 April 2005 with a supplementary affidavit by Mr McEwen filed in court by leave on 26 July 2005, affidavits of service of the bankruptcy notice and petition by Peter Miltenyi filed on 11 April 2005 and by leave in court on 26 July 2005, an affidavit by Jeremy David Shervington filed in court by leave on 26 July 2005 as to the continuing existence of the debt, an affidavit by Mark David Groben filed in court by leave on 26 July 2005, an affidavit by Martin David Hirst filed in court by leave on 26 July 2005 and an affidavit by Bryan Collis also filed in court by leave on 26 July 2005.
The petition is opposed by the debtor, Mr Anstee. He relies upon an amended notice of intention to oppose the petition filed in court by leave on 26 July 2005 with an affidavit in support filed in court by leave on the same day. Mr Anstee also relies upon five bundles of documents tendered during the course of argument today…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Biron Capital Limited v Anstee and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2005] FMCA 1100
Decision Date: 28 July 2005

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Biron Capital Limited has sought a sequestration order against Barry Francis Anstee, the defendant, due to outstanding debts. The Federal Court of Australia presided over this case. The applicant, Biron Capital Limited, alleged that the defendant had committed acts of bankruptcy by failing to pay debts owed to the applicant and other creditors. This case hinged on whether the defendant's financial situation justified the declaration of bankruptcy.

The court had to determine whether the defendant's financial obligations met the criteria for a sequestration order. The legal issues involved verifying the debt's existence, the defendant's ability to pay, and whether the defendant had committed an act of bankruptcy. The court also had to consider whether the applicant had followed the proper procedures in applying for the sequestration order.

The court found that the defendant had indeed committed acts of bankruptcy by failing to pay debts, and his financial situation justified the declaration of bankruptcy. The court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the sequestration of the defendant's estate. The court also ordered that the applicant's costs be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The court noted that a copy of these orders was to be given to the Official Receiver in Sydney within two days of the orders being entered. The court also noted that the date of the act of bankruptcy was 22 February 2005 and that consent to act as trustee had been signed by Maxwell William Prentice and lodged with the Official Receiver in Sydney.

Orders

Orders of the court

A sequestration order be made against the estate of Barry Francis Anstee.

The applicant creditor’s costs, including reserved costs if any, be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).

The Court notes that a copy of these orders is to be given to the Official Receiver in Sydney within two days after the orders are entered.

The Court notes that the date of the act of bankruptcy is 22 February 2005.

The Court notes that consent to act as trustee has been signed by Maxwell William Prentice and has been lodged with the Official Receiver in Sydney.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.