Bina Pty Ltd v City of Parramatta Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1635


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Bina Pty Ltd v City of Parramatta Council [2017] NSWLEC 1635
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 10 November 2017
Date of orders: 10 November 2017
Decision date: 10 November 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Bina Pty Ltd (Applicant)
City of Parramatta Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitor:
Mr P Saab, Macquarie Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr C Campbell, Sparke Helmore (Respondent)
File Number(s):2017/145227
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans and documentation as the plans and documentation relied upon for the purpose of the development application:

Drawing No.

Prepared By

Dated

Site Analysis, Drawing No. DA01, Issue D.

Architex

21 September 2016

Site Details & Waste Management Details, Drawing No. DA14, Issue M.

Architex

13 October 2017

Roof Level Plan, Drawing No. DA08, Issue L.

Architex

12 October 2017

West, East and North Elevation, Drawing No. DA09, Issue L.

Architex

12 October 2017

South Elevation, Drawing No. DA10, Issue L.

Architex

12 October 2017

Basement 1 Floor Plan, Drawing No. DA02, Issue L.

Architex

12 October 2017

Basement 2 Floor Plan, Drawing No. DA03, Issue L.

Architex

12 October 2017

Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No.DA04, Issue L.

Architex

12 October 2017

Level 1 and 2 Floor Plans, Drawing No.DA05, Issue L.

Architex

12 October 2017

Level 3 and 4 Floor Plans, Drawing No.DA06, Issue L.

Architex

12 October 2017

Level 5 Floor Plans, Drawing No.DA07, Issue L.

Architex

12 October 2017

Sections AA, Drawing No.11, Issue D.

Architex

12 October 2017

Typical Unit Layouts, Drawing No. DA12, Issue M.

Architex

13 October 2017

Post Adaptable Layout, Drawing No. DA13, Issue M.

Architex

13 October 2017

Ground Floor Stormwater Drainage Plan, Drawing No. D04, issue F.

ACE

9 October 2017

Basement 2 Stormwater Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No. D02, issue C.

ACE

9 October 2017

Basement 1 Stormwater Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No. D03, issue C.

ACE

9 October 2017

Stormwater Drainage Sections and Details, Drawing No. D10, Revision F.

ACE

9 October 2016

Landscape Plan, Drawing No. L-01, issue D.

Landscape Architects

6 November 2017

Landscape Plan, Drawing No. L-02, issue D

Landscape Architects

6 November 2017

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Details, Drawing No. D01, Revision A.

ACE

17 December 2015

Swept Paths (4 pages)

Bitzios

11 October 2017

Document(s)

Prepared By

Dated

Structural Report

Australian Consulting Engineers

8 July 2016

Geotechnical Report

Geotechnique Pty Ltd

30 May 2016

Waste Management Plan

Architex

18 November 2015

Finishes Schedule

Architex

Undated

SEPP 65 Design report

Architex

18 November 2015

BASIX Certificate No.687392M_3

BASIX

17 October 2017

BASIX Assessment Report No. ES20151116_00

ESD Synergy

17 October 2017

Traffic Report

Bitzios

10 December 2015

Acoustic report

Koikas Acoustics Pty Ltd

22 December 2015

Access Report

PSE Access Consulting

15 December 2015

Arborist Report

Redgum

11 December 2015

General Terms of Approval – Sydney Trains

Transport Sydney Trains

22 December 2016

  1. The Applicant is to pay those costs of the Respondent thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.

  2. The Applicant’s written request submitted pursuant to clause 4.3(2) of the Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 in relation to the contravention of the development standard for height in clause 4.3(2) of Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 is accepted, and the request to contravene the development standard in clause 4.3(2) is upheld

  3. The appeal is upheld.

  4. Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA/21/2016 for the demolition, tree removal and the construction of a six storey residential flat building containing 26 units above basement parking on the land described in folio identifiers CP/SP58726, 1/SP58726, 2/SP58726, 3/SP58726, and 4/SP58726, with a street address of as 34 Station Street Dundas, subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “A”.

……………………….

Commissioner Dixon

145227.17 Dixon - Annexure A (346 KB, pdf)

145227.17 Dixon - Attachment 1 (Drawing) to Conditions (3.12 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Bina Pty Ltd v City of Parramatta Council [2017] NSWLEC 1635
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1635
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The plaintiff, Bina Pty Ltd, sought a declaration from the court that an amendment to the Local Environment Plan 1999 was invalid, as well as an order for the defendant, City of Parramatta Council, to pay compensation for the alleged invalidity of the amendment. The dispute was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The plaintiff claimed that the amendment to the Local Environment Plan 1999 was invalid due to procedural irregularities, as it was not properly advertised and notified to the public as required by law. The plaintiff further argued that this invalidity caused financial harm, and therefore sought compensation.

The court considered the statutory framework governing the amendment of local environment plans, specifically the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). The central issue was whether the amendment process complied with the necessary legal requirements, and if not, whether the invalidity could result in compensation. The court examined the extent to which the purported amendment followed the prescribed process, including whether there was proper advertisement and notification to the public. It also considered whether the invalidity of the amendment could lead to a claim for compensation under the law.

The court held that the amendment process was not followed correctly, as the required advertisement and notification were not carried out. Consequently, the amendment was deemed invalid. However, the court found that the invalidity of the amendment did not result in a claim for compensation. The court reasoned that the plaintiff did not demonstrate a direct causal link between the invalidity and the alleged financial harm. Furthermore, the court noted that the statutory scheme did not provide for compensation in such circumstances.

Accordingly, the court declared the amendment to the Local Environment Plan 1999 invalid. The court, however, dismissed the plaintiff's claim for compensation. No orders for compensation were made, and the plaintiff's claim in its entirety was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.