BILLENCORP PTY LTD & BILLINGSLY

Case [2016] FamCA 1163


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BILLENCORP PTY LTD & BILLINGSLY [2016] FamCA 1163
FAMILY LAW – COSTS – Application for costs by a third party against the wife arising out of the wife’s application for enforcement of final property orders – where the third party submits that the wife’s application was misconceived – where the wife filed her application following the husband’s failure to make full and frank disclosure with respect to his financial circumstances and the financial circumstances of entities controlled by him or in which he had an interest – where the wife discontinued the orders sought by her against the third party upon being apprised of the husband’s present financial circumstances and the nature of the transactions between the husband and the third party – where the third party did not address s 117(2A) other than in a general sense – wife’s financial circumstances considered – no justification to depart from the usual rule as to costs – third party’s application for costs dismissed
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)
Somerton & Wells (Deceased) and Anor [2015] FamCAFC 12
APPLICANT: Billencorp Pty Ltd
RESPONDENT: Ms Billingsly
FILE NUMBER: MLC 745 of 2014
DATE DELIVERED: 11 November 2016
PLACE DELIVERED: Melbourne
PLACE HEARD: Melbourne
JUDGMENT OF: Macmillan J
HEARING DATE: 3 October 2016

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Ms Kirton QC
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Arnold Bloch Leibler
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Puckey
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Barry Nilsson Lawyers

Orders

IT IS ORDERED THAT

  1. Paragraph 1 of Billencorp Pty Ltd’s Application in a Case filed 2 August 2016 be dismissed.

  2. On or before 4.00 pm on 25 November 2016 the parties file and serve any written submissions in support of any application for costs arising out of or incidental to Billencorp Pty Ltd’s Application in a Case filed 2 August 2016.

  3. On or before 4.00 pm on 9 December 2016 the parties file and serve any reply to any written submissions in support of any application for costs arising out of or incidental to Billencorp Pty Ltd’s Application in a Case filed 2 August 2016.

  4. The question of the costs of Billencorp Pty Ltd’s  Application in a Case filed 2 August 2016 be determined based upon the parties’ written submissions subject to leave being sought to make oral submissions on or before 9 December 2016.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Billencorp Pty Ltd & Billingsly has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE

Continue reading BILLENCORP PTY LTD & BILLINGSLY

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
BILLENCORP PTY LTD & BILLINGSLY [2016] FamCA 1163
Case
[2016] FamCA 1163
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Victoria, Justice Macmillan considered an application brought by Billencorp Pty Ltd. The precise nature of the dispute between Billencorp Pty Ltd and the respondent, identified as "BILLENCORP PTY LTD & BILLINGSLY" in the case title, is not detailed, but the proceedings concerned Billencorp Pty Ltd's Application in a Case filed on 2 August 2016.

The central legal issue before the Court was the determination of Billencorp Pty Ltd's application filed on 2 August 2016. The Court was also required to address the consequential issue of costs arising from this application.

Justice Macmillan ordered that Billencorp Pty Ltd's application filed on 2 August 2016 be dismissed. The Court further directed the parties to file and serve written submissions regarding any applications for costs associated with this dismissed application by 25 November 2016, with a right for parties to file replies by 9 December 2016. The question of costs was to be determined based on these written submissions, with a provision for seeking leave to make oral submissions by 9 December 2016.

Orders

Orders of the court

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1.

Paragraph 1 of Billencorp Pty Ltd’s Application in a Case filed 2 August 2016 be dismissed.

2.

On or before 4.00 pm on 25 November 2016 the parties file and serve any written submissions in support of any application for costs arising out of or incidental to Billencorp Pty Ltd’s Application in a Case filed 2 August 2016.

3.

On or before 4.00 pm on 9 December 2016 the parties file and serve any reply to any written submissions in support of any application for costs arising out of or incidental to Billencorp Pty Ltd’s Application in a Case filed 2 August 2016.

4.

The question of the costs of Billencorp Pty Ltd’s Application in a Case filed 2 August 2016 be determined based upon the parties’ written submissions subject to leave being sought to make oral submissions on or before 9 December 2016.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.