BIH15 v Minister for Immigration
[2016] FCCA 785
•8 April 2016
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| BIH15 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2016] FCCA 785 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Migration & Refugees Division) – failure to appear at court date – application dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001. |
| Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s.476 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.13.03C(1)(c) |
| Applicant: | BIH15 |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 1923 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 8 April 2016 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 8 April 2016 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 8 April 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| No appearance by or on behalf of the applicant |
| Solicitors for the First Respondent: | Ms E Warner-Knight Australian Government Solicitors |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent fixed in the amount of $3416.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 1923 of 2015
| BIH15 |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for a Constitutional writ within the Court’s jurisdiction under s.476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in respect of a decision of the Tribunal made on 18 June 2015 affirming a decision of the delegate not to grant the applicant a protection visa.
The matter was listed for a callover today. There has been tendered a letter dated 4 March 2016 that was sent to the applicant’s address as identified on the application identifying the callover day. I am satisfied that the applicant was notified of the callover.
The first respondent moves that the matter can be dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001. I am satisfied that this is an appropriate matter in which to exercise the Court’s powers under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The application is dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Associate:
Date: 28 April 2016
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
3