Bico (Migration)

Case

[2022] AATA 2197

23 May 2022


Bico (Migration) [2022] AATA 2197 (23 May 2022)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mrs Jacoba Adriana Bico

REPRESENTATIVE:  Ms Johanna Jacoba Barnard (MARN: 1277481)

CASE NUMBER:  2010758

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE:               BCC2020/621320

MEMBER:Rosa Gagliardi

DATE:23 May 2022

PLACE OF DECISION:  Australian Capital Territory

DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Medical Treatment (Visitor) (Class UB) visa.

Statement made on 23 May 2022 at 1:10pm

CATCHWORDS

MIGRATION – Medical Treatment (Visitor) (Class UB) visa – Subclass 602 (Medical Treatment) – applicant caring for her Australian resident mother – Bupa Medical Report provided – compelling and compassionate reasons – request for Ministerial Intervention – decision under review affirmed     

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, ss 48, 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 602.212

statement of decision and reasons

application for review

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 17 June 2020 to refuse to grant the applicant a Medical Treatment (Visitor) (Class UB) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 1 March 2020. At that time, Class UB contained one subclass, Subclass 602 (Medical Treatment). The criteria for the grant of this visa are set out in Part 602 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).

  3. The delegate refused to grant the applicant the visa because there is little evidence that the applicant purports to seek medical treatment for herself in Australia.  Instead, she is wanting a visa to be able to care for her Australian resident mother, Mrs Hayes, who has a range of medical conditions.  Essentially, the applicant wishes to lodge a Carer visa to care for her mother.  This Medical Treatment visa has only been applied for as a vehicle to access Ministerial Intervention as it is acknowledged that the applicant cannot meet cl.602.212.

  4. This decision ought to be read in conjunction with Decision No: 2010759 (which relates to the applicant’s 9-year-old daughter who seeks to remain in Australia on the same basis as the applicant in this decision).

  5. The applicant requested that the Tribunal defer making a decision until her mother was able to obtain a recent Bupa Medical Report demonstrating that she needed care.  Unfortunately, due to COVID this report has been extensively delayed.

  6. The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 31 January 2022 to give evidence and present arguments.

  7. The applicant was represented in relation to the review.

  8. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided that the decision under review should be affirmed.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  9. The Subclass 602 Medical Treatment visa is for persons seeking to visit or remain in Australia temporarily for medical treatment or related purposes.

    Are the medical treatment requirements met?

  10. Clause 602.212, as extracted in the attachment to this decision, requires the applicant to meet one of the seven alternative sub criteria in cl 602.212(2)-(8). These relate to the basis for which the stay in Australia is required. Relevantly to this matter, cl 602.212(2) relates to the applicant seeking to obtain medical treatment (other than for the purpose of surrogate motherhood). Broadly speaking, it requires that:

    ·the arrangements for treatment have been concluded

    ·if the treatment is an organ transplant, the donor accompanies the applicant and all requisite arrangements have been concluded in Australia

    ·the applicant is free of a disease or condition that may be a threat to public health or a danger to the Australian community

    ·arrangements for payments of all costs and expenses associated with the treatment and stay have been concluded, and

    ·payment of such costs will not be a charge on a government or public authority in Australia, or there is evidence that the relevant government authority has approved payment.

  11. There is no suggestion that any of the other alternative sub criteria are relevant in this case.

  12. The applicant has not submitted evidence that she personally has a medical condition which needs treatment in Australia or that she meets any of the criteria for cl.602.212.  The applicant and her migration agent were clear in stating that they understood that the Medical Treatment visa was not for the purpose of caring for an Australian permanent resident/citizen.  The applicant herself is required to have a medical condition that needs to be treated in Australia.

  13. The Tribunal understands that the applicant is barred under s.48 from lodging an application for a Carer visa onshore.

  14. Given the circumstances, the requirements in cl. 602.212(2) are not met.

    Ministerial Intervention request

  15. A recent Bupa report submitted by the applicant demonstrates that that the applicant’s mother would require care for at least 2 years with everyday tasks in the following way:

  16. The minimum rating required to warrant a carer is a rating of 30.  The applicant’s mother has a rating of 40.  On the basis of the applicant’s mother’s conditions, there may be compelling and compassionate reasons for enabling the applicant to lodge a Carer visa in Australia to determine whether she meets the criteria for the grant of a such a visa.



    Conclusion

  17. Based on the findings above, the applicant does not meet the requirements for the grant of the visa. The decision under review must be affirmed.

    decision

  18. The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Medical Treatment (Visitor) (Class UB) visa.

    Rosa Gagliardi
    Member


    ATTACHMENT

    Migration Regulations 1994

    Schedule 2

    602.212 (1)    The requirements in one of subclauses (2) to (8) are met.

    Medical treatment

    (2)All of the following requirements are met:

    (a)    the applicant seeks to obtain medical treatment (including consultation), other than treatment for the purposes of surrogate motherhood, in Australia;

    (b)    arrangements have been concluded to carry out the treatment;

    (c)     if the treatment is an organ transplant:

    (i)the donor of the relevant organ is accompanying the applicant to Australia; or

    (ii)all requisite arrangements to effect the donation of the organ have been concluded in Australia;

    (d)    the applicant is free from a disease or condition that is, or may result in the applicant being, a threat to public health in Australia or a danger to the Australian community;

    (e)     arrangements have been concluded for the payment of all costs related to the treatment and all other expenses of the applicant’s stay in Australia, including the expenses of any person accompanying the applicant;

    (f)     either:

    (i)the payment of those costs will not be a charge on the Commonwealth, a State, a Territory or a public authority in Australia; or

    (ii)evidence is produced that the relevant government authority has approved the payment of those costs.

    Organ donor

    (3)All of the following requirements are met:

    (a)    the applicant seeks to donate an organ for transplant in Australia;

    (b)    if the organ recipient is also an applicant, the requirements described in subclause (2) are met in relation to the organ recipient;

    (c)     the applicant satisfies public interest criterion 4005;

    (d)    arrangements have been concluded for the payment of all costs related to the organ transplant and all other expenses of the applicant’s stay in Australia, including the expenses of any person accompanying the applicant;

    (e)     either:

    (i)the payment of those costs will not be a charge on the Commonwealth, a State, a Territory or a public authority in Australia; or

    (ii)evidence is produced that the relevant government authority has approved the payment of those costs.

    Support person

    (4)All of the following requirements are met:

    (a)    the applicant seeks to give emotional and other support to an applicant in relation to whom:

    (i)the requirements described in subclause (2) or (3) are met; or

    (ii)the requirements described in subclause 675.212(2) or (3) are met; or

    (iii)the requirements described in subclause 685.212(2) or (3) are met;

    (b)    the person to whom the applicant is to provide support holds:

    (i)a Subclass 602 visa on the basis that the requirements described in subclause (2) or (3) have been met; or

    (ii)a Subclass 675 (Medical Treatment (Short Stay)) visa on the basis that the requirements described in subclause 675.212(2) or (3) have been met; or

    (iii)a Subclass 685 (Medical Treatment (Long Stay)) visa on the basis that the requirements described in subclause 685.212(2) or (3) have been met;

    (c)     the applicant satisfies public interest criterion 4005.

    Western Province of Papua New Guinea

    (5)All of the following requirements are met:

    (a)    the applicant is a citizen of Papua New Guinea;

    (b)    the applicant resides in the Western Province of Papua New Guinea;

    (c)     the Department of the government of Queensland that is responsible for health has approved the medical evacuation of the applicant to, or treatment of the applicant in, a hospital in Queensland.

    Unfit to depart

    (6) All of the following requirements are met:

    (a)    the applicant is in Australia;

    (b)    the applicant has turned 50;

    (c)     the applicant has applied for a permanent visa while in Australia;

    (d)    the applicant appears to have met all the criteria for the grant of that visa, other than public interest criteria related to health;

    (e)     the applicant has been refused the visa;

    (f)     the applicant is medically unfit to depart Australia due to a permanent or deteriorating disease or health condition, as evidenced by a written statement to that effect from a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth.

    Financial hardship

    (7)All of the following requirements are met:

    (a)    one of the following applies:

    (i)the requirements described in paragraphs (2)(a) to (c) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (ii)the requirements described in paragraphs (3)(a) and (b) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (iii)the requirements described in paragraphs (4)(a) and (b) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (iv)the requirements described in subclause (5) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (v)the requirements described in paragraphs (6)(a) to (e) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (b)    the applicant is in Australia;

    (c)     the applicant holds:

    (i)a Subclass 602 visa; or

    (ii)a Subclass 675 (Medical Treatment (Short Stay)) visa; or

    (iii)a Subclass 685 (Medical Treatment (Long Stay)) visa;

    (d)    the applicant is suffering financial hardship as a result of changes in the applicant’s circumstances after entering Australia;

    (e)     the applicant, or a member of the applicant’s immediate family, is likely to become a charge on the Commonwealth, a State, a Territory or a public authority in Australia;

    (f)     the applicant, or a member of the applicant’s immediate family, cannot leave Australia for reasons beyond his or her control;

    (g)     the applicant has compelling personal reasons to work in Australia;

    (h)    the applicant satisfies public interest criterion 4005.

    Compelling personal reasons

    (8)All of the following requirements are met:

    (a)    one of the following applies:

    (i)the requirements described in paragraphs (2)(a) to (c) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (ii)the requirements described in paragraphs (3)(a) and (b) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (iii)the requirements described in paragraphs (4)(a) and (b) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (iv)the requirements described in subclause (5) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (v)the requirements described in paragraphs (6)(a) to (e) are met in relation to the applicant;

    (b)    the applicant is in Australia;

    (c)     the applicant has compelling personal reasons for the grant of the visa;

    (d)    the applicant satisfies public interest criterion 4005, other than paragraph 4005(1)(c).

Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Statutory Construction

  • Natural Justice

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

2