Biba
v
The King
[2023] HCASL 5
M58/2022
This amended application for special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria (McLeish, T Forrest and Kennedy JJA) is not a suitable vehicle to examine the question of law raised by the applicant. An appeal to this Court would have insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
J.J. Edelman S.H.P Steward 9 February 2023
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Biba v The King and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] HCASL 5
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The High Court was required to determine whether the application for special leave to appeal was suitable and whether there were sufficient prospects of success for the appeal. This involved assessing the merits of the legal arguments presented by the applicant and the likelihood that the High Court would find in their favour if the appeal were to proceed.
The High Court found that the application did not present a suitable vehicle to examine the question of law raised by the applicant. The Court concluded that an appeal to the High Court would have insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. Consequently, the application was dismissed. The Court's decision was based on the assessment of the legal arguments and the likelihood of success of the appeal. The High Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application, as per rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). This ruling effectively concludes the matter regarding the application for special leave to appeal in this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.