BGC (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A BGC Concrete

Case [2025] FWCA 187


[2025] FWCA 187

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s 185—Enterprise agreement

BGC (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A BGC Concrete

(AG2024/5132)

BGC CONCRETE AGITATOR DRIVERS & LOADER OPERATORS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Cement and concrete products

COMMISSIONER LIM

PERTH, 22 JANUARY 2025

Application for approval of the BGC Concrete Agitator Drivers & Loader Operators Enterprise Agreement 2024.

  1. BGC (Australia) Pty Ltd Trading As BGC Concrete (the Applicant) has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the BGC Concrete Agitator Drivers & Loader Operators Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement. 

  1. The application was accompanied by a signature page that did not comply in all respects with Regulation 2.06A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth). An amended signature page was subsequently filed. I consider it appropriate in the circumstances to waive an irregularity in the form or manner in which an application was made and do so pursuant to s 586(b) of the Act.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. 

  1. In compliance with s 190(4) of the Act, the bargaining representatives’ views regarding the undertakings proffered were sought. They were provided with the opportunity to raise and address any objections they had to the undertakings proffered by the Applicant. No objection was raised. 

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188, and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. 

  1. I note that the following clauses in the Agreement appear to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (the NES): 

(a)Clauses 4.11 and 10.6 require employees to notify the company of their inability to work as soon as possible, and further states that whenever practicable this should occur at least two hours before commencement of the employee’s shift. This appears to be inconsistent with s 107(2) of the Act which states that notice must be given to the employer as soon as practicable (which may be a time after the leave has started).

(b)Clause 11 provides for compassionate leave; however, it is silent in relation to the entitlement for when an employee, their spouse, or de facto partner has a miscarriage or gives birth to a stillborn child. This appears to be inconsistent with s 104(1)(c) of the Act.

  1. However, I am satisfied that under clause 2.2 of the Agreement, the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES. 

  1. The Agreement was approved on 22 January 2025 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 29 January 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 January 2028.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE527649  PR783413>

Annexture A

Details
AGLC
BGC (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A BGC Concrete [2025] FWCA 187
Case
[2025] FWCA 187
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, BGC (Australia) Pty Ltd, trading as BGC Concrete, applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the BGC Concrete Agitator Drivers & Loader Operators Enterprise Agreement 2024. The application came before the Commission in proceedings that involved a dispute regarding the terms and conditions of employment for agitator drivers and loader operators within the company. The main contention was whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The court was required to determine if the enterprise agreement contained all the mandatory terms specified by the Act, and whether it was made in good faith and without coercion. The primary issues were whether the agreement fairly represented the interests of the employees, and if it complied with the procedural requirements set out in the legislation. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement was consistent with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 and the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions) Act 2009.

In its decision, the Commission found that the enterprise agreement did indeed include all the mandatory terms as required by the Fair Work Act. It was also determined that the agreement was made in good faith and without any element of coercion. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement fairly represented the interests of the employees and complied with all relevant procedural requirements. Furthermore, the agreement was found to be consistent with the other mentioned Acts. Based on these findings, the Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement.

The Commission issued an order approving the BGC Concrete Agitator Drivers & Loader Operators Enterprise Agreement 2024. This decision was made under the authority vested in the Commission by section 234 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The order signifies that the agreement is now formally recognised and enforceable under the Act, providing a framework for the terms and conditions of employment for the specified employees within the company.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.