BFD Pymble Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1315
•25 July 2016
Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BFD Pymble Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2016] NSWLEC 1315 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 04 March, 07 April, 20 April, 04 May, 30 June and 21 July 2016 Date of orders: 25 July 2016 Decision date: 25 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: BFD Pymble Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Ku-ring-gai Council (Respondent)Representation: Mr M Jaukovic, Lin Tang & Co Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr C Shaw, Swaab Attorneys (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/00159352 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Da No: 0145/15 for the demolition of all existing structures and the construction of three residential flat buildings, a neighbourhood shop and basement car parking at 2-8 Pymble Avenue and 2-4 Everton Street Pymble.
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans prepared as the plans relied upon for the purpose of the development application:
Plan Reference
Drawn By
Dated
S34-000 Cover Sheet (V)
S34-005 Site Analysis (J)
S34-010 Existing / Demolition Site Plan (G) S34-011 Proposed Site Plan (S)
S34-100 Proposed Floor Plan – Basement 03 (Z)
S34-101 Proposed Floor Plan – Basement 02 (Z)
S34-102 Proposed Floor Plan – Basement 01 (Y)
S34-103 Proposed Floor Plan – Lower Ground 02 (Y)
S34-104 Proposed Floor Plan – Lower Ground 01 (Y)
S34-105 Proposed Floor Plan – Ground (Z)
S34-106 Proposed Floor Plan – Level 01 (Y)
S34-107 Proposed Floor Plan – Level 02 (Y)
S34-108 Proposed Floor Plan – Level 03 (Y)
S34-109 Proposed Floor Plan – Level 04 (Y)
S34-110 Proposed Floor Plan – Roof (Y)
S34-400 Proposed Building Elevations (M)
S34-401 Proposed Building Elevations (L)
S34-402 Proposed Building Elevations (L)
S34-403 Proposed Building Elevations (N)
S34-404 Proposed Building Elevations / Sections (M)
S34-420 Proposed Building Sections (L)
S34-517 Diagrams – Waste Allocation (E)
S34-524 Diagrams - Storage (E)
S34-927 External Finishes Sample Board (D)
S34-930 Photo Montage 1 (D)
S34-931 Photo Montage 2 (D)
SHED
31/05/16
LA-201 B – Landscape Concept Plan
LA-202 B – Landscape General Arrangement Plan
LA-203 A – Deep Soils Plan
LA-204 A – Placemaking Diagram
LA-301 B – Landscape Levels Plan
LA-401 A – Tree Plan
LA-402 A – Planting Plan
LA-403 A – Planting Schedule
Turf
1/6/2016
LA-501 B – Basix Complaince Diagram
LA-701 B – Sections
LA-702 B - Sections
Turf
2/6/2016
C.01, C.02, C.03, C.04, C.10, C.11, C.12, C.13, C.14, C.15, C.16 (All Issue F)
James Taylor and Associates
01.06.15
SW.01, SW.02, SW.03, SW.04, SW.05, SW.06, SW.07, SW.08, SW.09, SW.10, SW.11, SW.12, SW.13, SW.14, SW.15, SW.101
S34-528 Rev A, S34-528.1 Rev A, S34-528.2 Rev A, S34-528.3 Rev A
SHED
01/07/2016
The Applicant is to pay those costs of the Respondent thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is granted to Development Application No. 0145/15 for demolition of existing structures and the erection of three residential flat buildings containing 98 units, a neighbourhood shop, basement car parking and associated landscaping at 2-8 Pymble Avenue and 2-4 Everton Street, Pymble subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “A”.
…………….
G T Brown
Commissioner
159352.16 - Annexure A (180 KB, pdf)
Decision last updated: 02 August 2016
0
0
2