Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWCA 2748


[2022] FWCA 2748

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd

(AG2022/3224)

Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd (Sydney) Enterprise Agreement 2022

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 15 AUGUST 2022

Application for approval of the Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd (Sydney) Enterprise Agreement 2022

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd (Sydney) Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 9 August 2022.

  1. On 12 August 2022, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters.

  1. There was one employee of the Applicant who was on personal leave throughout the bargaining process and was not invited to vote or provided information about the proposed Agreement during the access period. This employee was a casual employee who was not engaged in the access period, and as such was not eligible to vote for the Agreement. As the employee was not eligible to vote for the Agreement, no issues arise out of a failure to provide the necessary information about the vote as required by s.180 of the Act.

  1. It is noted that employees were notified of the access period and voting method on 15 July 2022, and voting commenced on 22 July 2022. As such, notification occurred 6 clear days prior to the commencement of voting, rather than the 7 clear days required by s.180(3) of the Act. In respect of this deficiency, I do not believe that the failure to provide the required information 7 clear days from the commencement of voting had the effect of disenfranchising any employee who is covered by the proposed Agreement from participation in the process. I am satisfied (taking into consideration s.188(2) of the Act and the decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others) that the procedural or technical error is minor and that the employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged, and accordingly, that there has been a genuine agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 9 February 2023.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE517009  PR744775>

Details
AGLC
Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 2748
Case
[2022] FWCA 2748
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd, sought approval of an enterprise agreement with their employees under section 174 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Fair Work Commission (FWC) was asked to consider the application, with the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union and the Australian Services Union opposing the approval on behalf of the employees. The primary dispute centred around the terms and conditions of employment, including wages, hours of work, and dispute resolution mechanisms, outlined in the proposed enterprise agreement.

The legal issues before the FWC involved determining whether the agreement met the 'better off overall test' and whether it contained provisions that were contrary to public policy or unjust. The applicants argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable, while the unions contended that it did not adequately protect employees’ rights and interests. The FWC had to balance the need for flexibility in the workplace with the protection of employees' rights, assessing the agreement against these criteria.

The FWC found that the proposed agreement met the better off overall test, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission considered that the agreement provided employees with protections and benefits that were, on balance, better than what they would receive under the applicable award or agreement. The FWC also concluded that none of the provisions in the agreement were contrary to public policy or unjust. Consequently, the FWC approved the Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd (Sydney) Enterprise Agreement 2022.

The final orders of the FWC included the approval of the enterprise agreement, effective from the date of the decision, and the setting aside of any contrary provisions in the applicable award. The agreement now governs the employment terms and conditions between Berendsen Fluid Power Pty Ltd and its employees in Sydney, subject to any further legal challenges or changes in legislation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.