BEO15 v Minister for Immigration
[2015] FCCA 3418
•18 December 2015
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| BEO15 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2015] FCCA 3418 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Migrants and Refugees Division) – Protection (Class XA) visa – no appearance by the applicant – application dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001. |
| Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s.476 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, rr.13.03C(1)(c), 44.12 |
| Applicant: | BEO15 |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 1779 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 18 December 2015 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 18 December 2015 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 18 December 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| No appearance by or on behalf of the Applicant |
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Mr A Markus Australian Government Solicitors |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The Applicant pay the costs of the First Respondent fixed in the amount of $3416
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 1779 of 2015
| BEO15 |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for a Constitutional writ within the Court’s jurisdiction under s.476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in respect of a decision of the Tribunal made on 9 June 2015 affirming a decision of the delegate not to grant the applicant a protection visa. On 6 August 2015 a Registrar of the Court made orders fixing the matter for hearing today pursuant to r.44 12 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The matter was identified in the orders made by the registrar as being for hearing at 9.30 am, and it is now 10.30 am. The matter has been called. The applicant has failed to appear. The first respondent moves for dismissal of the application, pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules. First respondent has also tendered a letter dated 11 December 2015, which has been marked exhibit A, sent to the two addresses identified on the application filed by the applicant, enclosing the first respondent’s submissions and foreshadowing that if there is a failure to appear the first respondent may move to have the application dismissed with costs.
I am satisfied that the applicant was aware of the hearing date, and I am satisfied that this is an appropriate matter in which to exercise the Court’s powers under r.13.03C of the Federal Circuit Court Rules. The application is dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules.
I certify that the preceding three (3) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Associate:
Date: 18 December 2015
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
3