Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
1
-
Wickey v McVicar
[2012] ACTCA 38
Citation 1
(Para 22)
…y the principles set out by the High Court in House v The King .[5] [4] McLean v DID Piling Pty Ltd [2010] SASC 33 at [19]-[23]. [5] House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499. The Defendant’s Submissions…
-
Adelaide Bank Ltd v Lucke
[2010] SASC 59
Citation 2
(Para 21)
…ce of any demonstrable error in the Reasons of the Master.[3] [2] Lovrinov v Jusufovic [2014] SADC 207 per Beazley DCJ. [3] Adelaide Bank Ltd v Lucke [2010] SASC 59.…
-
McLean v DID Piling Pty Ltd
[2010] SASC 33
Citation 3
(Para 22)
…n an appeal from a Master, the court ought to apply the principles set out by the High Court in House v The King .[5] [4] McLean v DID Piling Pty Ltd [2010] SASC 33 at [19]-[23]. [5] House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499. The Defendant’s Submissions…
-
Hadgkiss v Aldin
[2006] FCA 1164
Citation 4
(Para 34)
…probability be effective to bring knowledge of the proceedings to the debtor. [11] Mendonca (a debtor), Re; Ex parte Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1969) 15 FLR 256.…
-
Laurie v Carroll
[1958] HCA 4
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…it. His amenability depended and still primarily depends upon nothing but presence within the jurisdiction. [13] Laurie v Carroll & Ors (1957-1958) 98 CLR 310 p 323 per Dixon CJ, Williams and Webb JJ.…
-
R v Khan (No 2)
[2014] SADC 207
Citation 6
(Para 21)
…l, may interfere with the exercise of a discretion in the absence of any demonstrable error in the Reasons of the Master.[3] [2] Lovrinov v Jusufovic [2014] SADC 207 per Beazley DCJ. [3] Adelaide Bank Ltd v Lucke [2010] SASC 59.…
-
Mayfield v Zadow and Zadow
[2006] SADC 70
Citation 7
(Para 20)
…threshold in an appeal such as this, the Court has a discretion as to whether it should intervene at all. [1] Mayfield v Zadow & Zadow [2006] SADC 70.…