Ben Larsson v Randwick City Council

[2017] NSWLEC 1060

Land and Environment Court

New South Wales

• Amendment notes

Medium Neutral Citation:	Ben Larsson v Randwick City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1060
Hearing dates:	Conciliation conference on 8 February 2017
Date of orders:	13 February 2017
Decision date:	13 February 2017
Jurisdiction:	Class 1
Before:	Chilcott C
Decision:	See (4) below
Catchwords:	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited:	Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:	Principal judgment
Parties:	Ben Larsson (Applicant) Randwick City Council (Respondent)
Representation:	Solicitor: Mr V Conomos, Conomos Legal (Applicant) Ms A Bowen, Eakin McCaffery Cox Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s):	2016/260347
Publication restriction:	No

Judgment

1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

1. The applicant is granted leave to file and rely on the amended plans referred to in Condition 1 and the landscape plan referred to in Condition 9 of Annexure ‘A’.

2. The appeal is upheld.

3. Development Application No. DA/11/2016 is approved, subject to conditions as set out in Annexure ‘A’.

……………………….

Commissioner Chilcott

Annexure A - Conditions (434 KB, pdf)

260347.16 Chilcott - Plans (6.42 MB, pdf)

Amendments

15 February 2017 - Correction to the name of Respondents Representative

Decision last updated: 15 February 2017