Belz v Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read
CITATION: Belz v Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson [2010] QCAT 595
PARTIES: Mr Damien Belz
v
Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson
APPLICATION NUMBER:   OCR288-10  
MATTER TYPE: Occupational regulation matters
HEARING DATE:     On the papers
HEARD AT:  Brisbane
DECISION OF: Joanne Browne, Member
DELIVERED ON: 16 November 2010
DELIVERED AT:      Brisbane

ORDERS MADE:

1. The application for stay is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS :  Application for stay
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 section 22; public interest considered; and interests of the applicant considered

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

Decision on the papers.

REASONS FOR DECISION

The Application

  1. An application has been made by the applicant to review a decision made on 29 October 2010 by a assistant commissioner of police, Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson (“the respondent”) in relation to a disciplinary hearing conducted under the Police Service Administration Act 1990 and the Queensland Police Human Resource Management Manual (“HRMM”) held on 19 October 2010.

  1. The respondent delivered his findings and reasons on 29 October 2010 that the following disciplinary charge of misconduct against Sergeant Damien Anthony Belz (“the applicant”) was substantiated:

Matter 1

That on the 29th day of November 2009 at Surfers Paradise your conduct did not meet the standard of conduct the community reasonably expects of a police officer in that you:

a)Used excessive force against Rebecca Maree Pitt, whist she was in custody; and

b)Used excessive force against Rebecca Maree Pitt, whilst she was in custody.

[Section 1.4 and 7.4 of the Police Service Administration Act 1990 and s. 9(1) (f) of the Police Service (Discipline) Regulations 1990.]

Further and better particulars

Investigations have identified that:

§On 29 November 2009 you held the position of Sergeant at the Surfers Paradise Police Station, within the South Eastern Region;

§You performed duty as a shift supervisor from 11:00pm in the prisoner processing area at Surfers Paradise Station;

§At about 11:40pm on 29 November 2009 Rebecca Maree Pitt was in custody and placed in a holding cell; and

§While in the holding cell the prisoner attempted to self harm by hitting her head against fixed objects within the holding cell.

In relation to 1 a):

§At about 11:50pm on 29 November 2009 you entered the holding cell, took hold of Rebecca Maree Pitt’s hair and moved her from the cell floor to the cell bench seat.

In relation to 1 b):

§At about 11:52pm on 29 November 2009 you re-entered the holding cell, took hold of Rebecca Maree Pitt’s hair and moved her from the cell bench seat to an area outside that holding cell.

  1. The respondent having found the charge to be substantiated ordered that the applicant be demoted in rank from Sergeant 3.3 to Senior Constable 2.9 for a period of twelve (12) months from [29 October 2010] and further ordered that:

“At the end of the twelve month period and dependant upon your successful completion of your Performance Planning and Assessment (PPA), I order you be eligible to apply for the rank of Sergeant”.

  1. The applicant…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Belz v Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2010] QCAT 595
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Belz, sought a stay of a decision made by the Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson under the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009. The dispute centred around the Assistant Commissioner's decision and Belz's desire to halt proceedings pending the resolution of the application. The case was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT). The primary legal issue for the tribunal was whether the applicant's application for a stay of the Assistant Commissioner's decision should be granted. This required the tribunal to consider the balance between the public interest and Belz's interests.

The tribunal examined the relevant provisions of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009, particularly section 22, which outlines the circumstances under which a stay may be granted. The tribunal considered the public interest in enforcing the decision, the potential harm to the public if the decision was stayed, and Belz's interests in seeking a stay. The tribunal also weighed the merits of Belz's application and the likelihood of success on the merits. Ultimately, the tribunal concluded that the application for a stay should be dismissed. The tribunal found that the public interest in enforcing the decision outweighed Belz's interests in seeking a stay.

The tribunal dismissed the application for a stay of the Assistant Commissioner's decision. In reaching this decision, the tribunal determined that the public interest in enforcing the decision was significant, and the potential harm to the public if the decision was stayed was substantial. Additionally, the tribunal found that Belz's interests in seeking a stay were not sufficient to warrant a stay. The tribunal also considered the merits of Belz's application and found that the likelihood of success on the merits was low. Therefore, the tribunal dismissed the application for a stay of the Assistant Commissioner's decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application for stay is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.