[2013] FWCA 5247 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Beechworth Surgery and Chiltern Medical Clinic
(AG2013/1859)
BEECHWORTH SURGERY AND CHILTERN CLINIC PRACTICE NURSES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013 - 2016
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 6 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Beechworth Surgery and Chiltern Clinic Practice Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] On 8 July 2013 Beechworth Surgery and Chiltern Medical Clinic made an application for approval of the Beechworth Surgery and Chiltern Clinic Practice Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged outside of the 14 day timeframe prescribed by section 185(3)(a) the Act. The Commission invited the parties to explain the late lodgement. On 2 September 2013, Ms Natasha Fletcher, the Applicant’s representative, advised that the Agreement was lodged out of time due to a failure of her delegate to file the application while Ms Fletcher was absent from work. In all the circumstances the Commission considers it fair to extent the period for lodgement and does so pursuant to section 185(3)(b).
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 13 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 December 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE402782 PR539634>
- AGLC
- Beechworth Surgery and Chiltern Medical Clinic [2013] FWCA 5247
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5247
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide if the proposed agreement contained the minimum terms and conditions required by law, if it was free from any illegality, and if it had been negotiated in good faith. It was also necessary to determine whether the agreement provided a fair and reasonable balance of benefits and burdens to the parties involved. Further, the court had to consider whether the agreement complied with the requirements for direct registration as set out in the Fair Work Regulations 2009.
The Fair Work Commission approved the proposed agreement. The Commission found that the agreement contained the minimum terms and conditions required by law and was free from any illegality. It was determined that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and provided a fair and reasonable balance of benefits and burdens to the parties involved. Additionally, the Commission found that the agreement complied with the requirements for direct registration. The Commission was satisfied that the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval under section 231 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.