Bee v Ziebarth
Case
•
[2009] QDC 297
•8/09/2009
No judgment structure available for this case.
[2009] QDC 297
DISTRICT COURT
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
JUDGE DEVEREAUX SC
Appeal No 7 of 2009
| HEDRICK JOSEPH BEE | Appellant |
| v. CONST MJ ZIEBARTH | Respondent |
| MOUNT ISA ..DATE 08/09/2009 | |
| ORDER |
1-1
HIS HONOUR: The appellant was convicted on 6 February 2009 of
1
three offences. They were committing a public nuisance,
obstructing police, and assaulting police.
Upon conviction, the learned Magistrate made an award for
| costs against the appellant. His Honour said at 1-22, line | 10 |
| 50, and following, "I come to the conclusion that the ordinary | |
| rule that the costs follow the event should not be departed | |
| from in this instance, and it does appear that as much as is | |
| possible, the police service have tried to minimise those | |
| costs." | 20 |
| In the result, his Honour made an award of costs which comprised travel costs for the witness. | |
| The Notice of Appeal dated 27 February 2009, and filed, as I | 30 |
| understand it, on 3 March 2009, pleaded as a ground of appeal that the sentence imposed in respect to the order for costs is manifestly excessive in all the circumstances. | |
| Mr Hunter, solicitor for the appellant, confines his complaint | 40 |
| on appeal, to the costs order, and Mr Anderson of the Office | |
| of the Director of Public Prosecutions, who appears on behalf | |
| of the respondent, concedes that the Magistrate's exercise of | |
| discretion was affected by error. I respectfully adopt that | |
| concession. If the Magistrate was of the view that costs | 50 |
| ordinarily follow the event, and if that view led to the order in this case, that view was wrong. Any such view was gainsaid by the High Court in Latoudis v | 1-2 | ORDER | 60 |
1
Casey (1990) 97 Australian Law Reports 45.
In the circumstances, I allow the appeal, and set aside that
part of the Magistrate's decision which comprised the order
| for costs. | 10 |
| ... | |
| HIS HONOUR: What I will do is, having given judgment for the | |
| appellant, I will reserve the question of costs and mention | 20 |
| this appeal again on Thursday morning, the 10th of September | |
| 2009. |
-----
30
40
50
1-3 ORDER 60
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Bee v Ziebarth [2009] QDC 297
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0