| [2022] FWCA 3804 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Bedford Phoenix Inc
(AG2022/4176)
Bedford Phoenix Incorporated Staff Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Social, community, home care and disability services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'NEILL | MELBOURNE, 4 NOVEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Bedford Phoenix Incorporated Staff Enterprise Agreement 2022
Bedford Phoenix Inc has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bedford Phoenix Incorporated Staff Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and is a single enterprise agreement.
The Agreement lodged contained an error whereby a provision was omitted from the preserved redundancy entitlements outlined in Schedule 4. On 18 October 2022, the Employer provided an amended Schedule 4 to be inserted into the Agreement. Pursuant to s.586 of the Act, I am satisfied that the correction should be made and that it is appropriate to do so.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union, the Australian Workers’ Union, the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and the United Workers’ Union, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
I observe that clause 23.6.1 is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 November 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 October 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517994 PR747384>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Bedford Phoenix Inc [2022] FWCA 3804
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3804
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the agreement to determine whether it complied with the relevant legislative framework. The primary issue was whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, including adequate pay and conditions, and whether it facilitated a fair and efficient process for resolving disputes. The Commission also considered the extent to which the agreement allowed for meaningful consultation and negotiation between the employer and the employees.
After thorough consideration, the Commission found that the Bedford Phoenix Incorporated Staff Enterprise Agreement 2022 was fair and reasonable in its terms and conditions. The Commission determined that the agreement met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The concerns raised by the union were addressed through modifications to certain clauses, ensuring they aligned with the principles of fairness and reasonableness. The Commission approved the agreement, recognising it as a valid and binding enterprise agreement.
The final orders included the approval of the agreement, subject to the modifications made to address the union's concerns. The Commission mandated that the employer and the union adhere to the terms of the agreement and that any future disputes would be resolved in accordance with the processes outlined within the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.