BEC15 v Minister for Immigration
[2016] FCCA 784
•8 April 2016
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| BEC15 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2016] FCCA 784 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Migration & Refugee Division) – failure to appear – application dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001. |
| Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s.476 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.13.03C(1)(c) |
| Applicant: | BEC15 |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 1755 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 8 April 2016 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 8 April 2016 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 8 April 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| No appearance by or on behalf of the applicant |
| Solicitors for the First Respondent: | Ms N Blake Clayton Utz |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent fixed in the amount $3416.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 1755 of 2015
| BEC15 |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for a Constitutional writ within the Court’s jurisdiction under s.476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in respect of a decision the Tribunal made on 28 May 2015 affirming the decision of the delegate not to grant the applicant a protection visa.
The matter was listed for callover today and the applicant has failed to appear. The first respondent has moved for the matter to be dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
A letter dated 4 March 2016 has been tendered and marked exhibit A. That letter was sent to the address that appears on the applicant’s application. I am satisfied that the applicant was aware of the callover. I am satisfied this is an appropriate matter in which to exercise the Court’s powers under r.13.03C(1)(c).
The application is dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Associate:
Date: 28 April 2016
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
3