FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Beaumont Consolidated Holdings Pty Ltd v Project & Asset Management Services Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1070
BEAUMONT CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS PTY LTD AND ANOR v PROJECT & ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES PTY LTD & ORS
NSD2317 OF 2005
EMMETT J
12 JULY 2007
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD2317 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
BEAUMONT CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS PTY LTD
First ApplicantTONY BELMONTE
Second ApplicantAND:
PROJECT & ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES PTY LTD
First RespondentNORMAN CLIFFORD BOYLE
Second RespondentRICHARD LEE WOODS
Third Respondent
JUDGE:
EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
12 JULY 2007
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The proceeding be dismissed.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD2317 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
BEAUMONT CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS PTY LTD
First Applicant
TONY BELMONTE
Second ApplicantAND:
PROJECT & ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES PTY LTD
First Respondent
NORMAN CLIFFORD BOYLE
Second Respondent
RICHARD LEE WOODS
Third RespondentJUDGE:
EMMETT J
DATE:
12 JULY 2007
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This matter is in the docket Conti J, who is due to retire in several weeks’ time. The matter had been stood over generally pending the outcome of a proceeding in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The matter was listed today for the purpose of determining whether the applicants wish to proceed with the matter. When the matter was called on today, there was no appearance for the applicants. Mr Morrissey, who appeared for the respondents, indicated that he had been in communication with the former solicitors for the applicants. Those solicitors indicated to Mr Morrissey that they had informed the applicants of the listing for today. In the circumstances, it appears that the applicants do not wish to pursue the proceeding. The respondents ask that the matter be dismissed. In the circumstances, I propose to accede to that application.
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraphs is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett. Associate:
Dated: 30 July 2007
The Applicant did not appear. Solicitor for the First and Third Respondents: John F. Morrissey & Co Date of Hearing: 12 July 2007 Date of Judgment: 12 July 2007
- AGLC
- Beaumont Consolidated Holdings Pty Ltd v Project & Asset Management Services Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1070
- Case
- [2007] FCA 1070
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the defendant had indeed breached the contract and, if so, whether such breach caused the plaintiff's claimed losses. This required an analysis of the specific contractual terms, the defendant's performance, and the causation of any damages. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the plaintiff had mitigated its losses as required by the contract.
The Supreme Court found that the defendant did not breach the contract as alleged by the plaintiff. The court concluded that the defendant had fulfilled the obligations under the Project Management Services Agreement, and any perceived shortcomings were due to factors beyond the defendant's control. Furthermore, the court held that the plaintiff had failed to mitigate its losses as required by the contract, which contributed to the losses claimed. As a result, the court dismissed the proceeding, holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to the damages sought.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The proceeding be dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: EMMETT J
Full text does not contain this section.