Beau Connor (BY His Litigation Representative Peter Connor) v State of Queensland (Department of Education and Training)
[2021] HCASL 129
BEAU CONNOR (BY HIS LITIGATION REPRESENTATIVE PETER CONNOR)
v
STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING)
[2021] HCASL 129
B26/2021
The applicant, by his litigation representative, requires an extension of time within which to file the application for special leave to appeal. The applicant has not identified a question of principle of general importance sufficient to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal and otherwise advances no arguable ground of appeal against the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Reeves, Perry and Snaden JJ) dismissing the applicant's appeal against the decision of the Federal Court of Australia (Rangiah J) dismissing the applicant's claim that the respondent had discriminated against him in contravention of s 22(2) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth). An appeal to this Court would enjoy insufficient prospects of success. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension that is sought. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
M.M. Gordon S.H.P. Steward 5 August 2021
0
0